20 July 2006

20 July 2006

Observing LocationCSP
Observational Period0200-0530 EDT
Atmospheric ConditionsThe last observed conditions I saw said it was mild and clear at Central Park and the forecast was calling for it to be mostly clear until daybreak then to become foggy for a while. Thunderstorms are forecast for tonight.

It is cool and very humid with a stiff breeze. The metal parts on my scope have cooled down to 65&def;F but the primary mirror is still at 74°F.

Central Park
HourTemp
°F
Wind
MPH / Dir / Gust
SkyVis
mi
0151 EDT736 / Var / --Broken10
0251 EDT739 / NE / --Overcast10
0351 EDT728 / NE / --Scattered10
0451 EDT729 / NE / --Overcast10
0551 EDT729 / NE / --Overcast10

La Guardia Airport
HourTemp
°F
Wind
MPH / Dir / Gust
SkyVis
mi
0151 EDT749 / E / --Scattered
Broken
10
0251 EDT739 / E / --Overcast10
0351 EDT739 / NE / --Scattered
Scattered
Overcast
10
0451 EDT7316 / NE / --Overcast10
0551 EDT7315 / NE / --Mostly Cloudy10

I think the sky is completely overcast with low clouds. There were some small dark patches but I couldn't tell if I am looking through gaps in the cloud to sky or more clouds above or at a dark patch of cloud rather than a gap. I suspected it is the latter but later I saw the Moon in those dark placdes.

TransparencyPoor
SeeingExcellent
InstrumentsSAR: Coulter CT-100 -Charlie
Canon 15x50 IS binocular w/AstroSolar filter film- Charlie
Grundig YB400 short wave radio - Charlie Miscellaneous recording devices - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetOccultation of M45 by the Moon
ConstellationTau
CategoryOccultation, Lunar
Time20060720.0252- EDT
CommentsThe occultations began on the bright limb at 0252 EDT with stars reappearing from behind the dark limb. The occultations continued until after sunrise. Many events were not visible in the glare from the 24% illuminated, 24d14+h, waning gibbous Moon.
Dummy me forgot to bring my camera. Not that it made that much difference, as it turns out, since I rarely saw the Moon. But it looked good when I did see it.

I kept receiving alarms from my PDA telling me this star or that one was about to disappear or reappear but mostly all I could see was clouds.

I had all the wires to inject the signal into the MiniDisk along with my voice from a microphone, but whenever I plugged the cable into the splitter that directed time signals to an external speaker and to the mixer it cut the short wave signal out. I haven't had this problem before so fell back to just using the Olympus digital recorder which is generally good at picking up the time signals as well as my voice.

The wind and the static on the radio made the digital recording difficult to interpret. For the most part I parroted the time each minute and the minute toned cut through the wind although it had trouble with the voice, as did I. The short wave signal got really bad several times and I had trouble understanding the minute announcements for a long stretch of time.

~0840:02 UTC
Merope Reappearance
The recorder wasn’t running so I lost the time stamp.
I just got back to the eyepiece in time to see it pop out from behind the dark limb.
0819 UTC
There are two stars off the dark limb, a bright one and a dim one (Alycone and ?TYC1800-02201-1?)
0857:16.69 UTC
Atlas Reappearance
0901:11.15 UTC
HIP17862 Reappearance


Observing LocationMetOval
Observational Period2150-2220 EDT
Atmospheric ConditionsWarm and very humid. No breeze at all.
TransparencyGood
Seeing
Instruments Naked-Eye Observing - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetIridium 72 Flare
ConstellationCyg
CategorySatellite
Time2006.0720.2209 EDT
CommentsThis Mag -2 flare started low in Cyg beneath Deneb and moved up toward Alberio. It became very bright and was fairly persistent. At the same tile a much fainter satellite appeared above and behind the Iridium and crossed its track behind the iridium traveling more horizontally. This was an easy naked eye object so was probably around Mag 3. I checked Heavens above and all the satellites they list in that timeframe are moving S to N. I don't see anything listed that might have been this satellite, I will have to check CalSky when I get home and see if it sheds any light.

I remembered that I had recently installed a demo version of PocketSat+ on my PDA and ran it to see what it would say. It doesn't give magnitude estimates. It didn’t do any better identifying my unanticipated bird but the program has some nice features like the satellite's footprint and a real-time radar plot of its position. Unfortunately some of the buttons are to close to the bottom edge of my screen for me to be able to press them with my degraded touch screen. I can't exit some screens back to the menu and have to exit the program and restart it.

I checked Orbitron and wasn’t able to identify any satellites that fit the bill.

CalSky says that Cosmos 1271 began a visible pass in the N at 2103 EDT; reached its zenith in Cyg at Mag 3.9 at 2108 EDT; then crossed the right wing of the swan and passed close to Alberio before disappearing in the SSE at 2112 EDT.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.