31 December 2006

30 December 2006

Observing LocationTotL
Observational Period2015-0215 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverScattered Clouds
Temperature30s F
WindCalm
gusting to
Moderate Breeze
HumidityModerate
Feels LikeRaw

There were streams of clouds coming in from the west low on the horizon all night. At the end of the night the Moon had a white ring around it but still looked good in the scope. The seeing would periodically go soft for several seconds at a time. I was dressed warmly but could have used another later all the way around.

TransparencyGood
SeeingIII
InstrumentsSAR: Coulter CT-100 Newtonian reflector - Charlie
  • Celestron Omni 20mm
  • Celestron Omni 2x Barlow

Teleport 10" Donsonisn reflector - Peter
Celestron 7x50 binocular - Kin
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway
Peter Tagatac
Kin Lee
Time's Up Midnight Ride (all two of them)
I don't remember a whole lot of what I looked at. In SAR I looked at the Moon, the Pleiades, the Beehive, Saturn, M42

In Peters Scope we saw some double stars, some galaxies and Saturn.

TargetMoon
ConstellationTau
CategoryLunar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20061230.2030 EST
Comments
Lunation1039
PhaseWaxing Gibbous
Age10d11h28m
Elongation134.84°
% Illuminated85.3%
Magnitude-11.7
Altitude72.3°
Tonight Tycho looked like it was sitting on a triangular island with a few craters in it (the island). The ocean around the island was sculpted by waves of craters.

Gassendi was tangent to the terminator. It is nicely proportioned to beet round Mare Humorum and the two look like a pair of interlocking watch hears.

Peter said that Lepler should be a small crater on the terminator near Copernicus. I found two craters there that fit that bill, one right on the terminator and the other some distance into the morning sunlight. When he added that it would br surrounded by a heat ring it was easy to spot it as the ejecta blanket was visible in this light.

That reminds me of a short discussion we had last night about crater formation. Peter says that the formation theory says that the surface material ekcted from a crater will go farthest from the impact site because the impactor is dissipating the most energy at that time. As the impactor burrows down its energy has being dissipated and subsequent material can't be thrown as far from the forming crater. So the resulting ejecta blanket will have deep material closest to the crater wall and surface material farthest away. I think that is probably a simplified theory as it does not take into account possible density differences in the material being ejected. If the surface material was denser than the material beneath it it might not be thrown as far as less dense material beneath it. And taking the terrestrial impactor model that has dust from the impact becoming airborne and circling the earth on the winds: how would this translate to a lunar environment? Since there is a lesser gravity on the Moon it seems that material ejected into the less dense lunar atmosphere could remain suspended there for a much longer period of time and would not br spread around the entire Moon since it rotates very slowly and the only wind to disturb the plume would be the solar wind. How much lunar material would receive enough energy to reach escape velocity and where would it go after it escaped the Moon. Now I want to do some reading on lunar cratering theory.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.