28 February 2007

28 February 2007

Observing LocationVP
Observational Period1130-1145 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverScattered Clouds
Temperature40°F
Wind9 MPH
HumidityHigh
Feels LikeMild
34°F Wind Chill

Why is it that when there are scattered clouds they are always scattered in the sky where you want to be looking.
The view was good today and the temperature very comfortable. There was a little bit of instability in the air.

TransparencyGood
SeeingII
Instruments Canon 15x50 IS binocular w/Baader AstroSolar filter film - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationAqr
CategorySolar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.1130 EST
Comments
Distance
Light Time
0.991 AU
8m14s
Angular Size32'17"
Altitude40.69°
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
-7.21°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
45.92°
Position Angle
(P)
-21.34°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2053

I saw one group, 944, smack dab in the center of the disk today. Active Region Explorer says Group 945 is a little way behind it but it was too small for me to see even with the big binocular. Both groups are in the southern hemisphere.

 Groups SpotsR
North 0 0 0
South 1 1 11
Total 1 1 11
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)

Group 944
Heliographic Latitude -7°
Heliographic Longitude 46°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2053
Mcintosh System Axx
This is a fairly large spot but not so large that I can detect penumbra around it.



I saw in my Universe Today news a story that lead me to a NASA press release about a possible Moon habitat for the 2020 first landing of astronauts on the return to the Moon missions (has that date slipped again…I thought it had been 2018). It has a picture of a woman standing on a ladder at the door of the habitat. Based on the statistics that the size of the average woman is smaller than that of the average man it looks like NASA must be planning to send midgets to the Moon this time. The hatch of the habitat does not appear to be any taller than the woman and not much wider, and she is not wearing a clumsy spacesuit with a big helmet and life support unit.


Image from NASA. Click for a larger view.



Asellus Borealis, γ Cnc, will be occulted by the Moon tonight. The star is fairly bright, Mag 4.66, but there isn’t much of the dark of the Moon left so it is doubtful that I will see it in my optics. I may try the disappearance from the house before heading down to TotL.



Observing LocationTotL
Observational Period1900-0130 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature40°F
falling to
33°F
WindLight Breeze
Humiditymoderate
Feels Likemild
becoming
cold and a little raw

It appears clear but it is not transparent enough for me to make out Pherkad Minor or any of the dimmer stars of the bowl and handle of the little Dipper. There is a colored halo around the Moon. The image is rock solid.

TransparencyGood
SeeingI
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 IS binocular - Charlie
Harry (the Kite): 150mm DIY Newtonian Reflector - Peter
Takahashi 22x60 binocular - Peter
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway
Peter Tagatac
Kin Lee

TargetMoon
ConstellationCnc
CategoryLunar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.1915 EST
Comments
Lunation1041
PhaseWaxing Gibbous
Age11d8h00m
Distance
Light Time
(from earth)
389,000 km
1.3s
Elongation146.50°E
% Illuminated91.7%
Magnitude-11.8
Angular Size30'45"
Altitude49.52°
The Moon, Saturn and Regulus are in a slightly bowed line.
The terminator is just in the western edge of Aristarchus.
Schiller made a big dark divot into the morning light.
When Peter set up his scope we spent some time looking at the maria between Mare Crisium and the limb.
We also observed the terminator around Aristarchus where Peter thought he saw a couple of domes. I haven’t been able to identify anything we saw there in either the LAC or in Virtual Moon Atlas.
[3Mar07 Peter, who knows the moon a lot better than I do has done the research and found that the domes are Mons Gruithuisen γ

Virtual Moon Atlas graphic

detail from LAC chart 23
Peter also provided this link to more information on Mons Gruithuisen.]
The feature is located kust to the SW of Promontory Heraclides at the SW corner of Sinus Iridum in Mare Imbrium.

The VMA is a little frustrating as it only identifies craters. If a maria doesn’t get named when the map draws you are out of luck.

TargetOccultation of β Cnc
ConstellationCnc
CategoryOccultation
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.1939-2101 EST
Comments, β Cnc, Mag 4.66, was a short distance from the terminator at 7:30 to the Moon. At first it was hard to are but after I knew where to expect it it became easy.

D ~1939:45

I did not observe the reappearance although I was watching for it intently. Peter said he found the star a good distance behind the bright limb of the Moon. I looked for a but and couldn't find it until I tipped my binocular further up so that only a small chord of the limb was in the FoV and then the star became visible.

TargetM44, Pearsape, Beehive Cluster
ConstellationCnc
CategoryDSO: Ocl
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.19## EST
CommentsWhile counting stars in M44 a satellite flew through the cluster. I tracked it as it flew through the glare just below the moon but didn't are it come out the other side. I didn't timestamp that note so can't go back and yet to identify the satellite. I counted 16 stars in the Beehive.

TargetM67, NGC 2682
ConstellationCnc
CategoryDSP: OCl
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.2007 EST
CommentsNot Seen

TargetM41
ConstellationCMa
Category
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.2021 EST
CommentsI saw six stars.

TargetNGC 2204
ConstellationCMa
CategoryDSO:
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.2023 EST
Commentsdetected

TargetSaturn
ConstellationLeo
CategoryPlanet
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070228.2200 EST
Comments
Object
Class
Classical Planet
Elongation160.00°E
Distance
Light Time
(from Earth)
8.26 AU
hm
Distance
(from Sun)
9.19Au
Angular Size20"x17.7"
Ring
Angular
Size
45.5"x11.4"
Ring
Inclination
14.57°
Magnitude0.0
Altitude62.63°
I didn’t focus because there were others around, but could make out the Casini Division, the C ring in front of the planet and the shadow of the planet on the rings. Peter said the view was a bit soft but he saw a band on the planet and the ice cap at the pole.

TargetM3, NGC 5272
ConstellationCVn
CategoryDSO: GCl
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070301 EST
CommentsThis is what we saw the other night and I couldn’t remember its identity (I have been bad about making field notes lately). It was big and fairly bright but more impressive in the 10”.



 DayNightTotal
HoursDaysAvgHoursDaysAvgHoursDaysAvg
Jan4.25120.357.7590.8612.00160.75
Feb3.50140.2520.7554.1524.25151.62
TOTAL 7.75260.3528.50140.8636.25310.75

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.