23 May 2006

22 May 2006

Location: TotL
Observational Period: 2115-2330 EDT
Atmospheric Conditions: Cool with scattered clouds. Moderate wind with gusts, the tripod and binocular kept getting buffeted making it hard to see detail until the wind stopped and the binocular settled.
Transparency: Good
Seeing: Fair
Instruments: Brunton 8x21 compact binocular - Charlie
These small binoculars are hard to hold steady. I looked through Peter's optics more than I did mine.
Takahashi 22x60 binocular - Peter
Fujinon 7x50 binocular - Peter
Observing Party: Charlie Ridgway
Peter Tagatac

Target: Saturn and M44
Constellation: Cnc
Category: Planet and Deep Sky Object
Time: 20060522.2130 EDT
Comments:Saturn looked very crisp in the lower right corner of Peter's binocular and was very obviously cigar shaped. M44 was easily inside the FOV at the upper right and showed good contrast with the background sky but I did not detect the stardust between the brighter stars. This is probably due to binocular movement.

Target: Mars
Constellation: Gem
Category: Planet
Time: 20060522.2130 EDT
Comments: Observed naked-eye. Mars continues to move eastward and is now below Pollux's right hand.

Target: Jupiter
Constellation: Lib
Category: Planet
Time: 20060522.2145 EDT
Comments: When we first observed Jupiter one moon was just visible against the trailing limb of the planet. Later in the night it had disappeared. The remaining moon were all on that same side of the planet and being farther from the planet appeared to be brighter and bigger. I was not to make out any banding on the planet but the wind was buffeting the binocular so the seeing wasn't that good.

Target: M5, NGC5904
Constellation: Ser
Category: Deep Sky Object
Time: 20060522.2230 EDT
Comments: A large faint fuzzy

Target:Graffias, β Sco
Constellation: Sco
Category: Double Star
Time: 20060522.2245 EDT
Comments: A tight double with great disparity in brightness. The secondary appeared to be at 11:00 to the primary.

Target: 14 Sco
Constellation: Sco
Category: Double Star
Time: 20060522.2250 EDT
Comments: A wide double; more equal than the previous one. The secondary appears bluish and the primary slightly yellowish but I can't say that those are the star colors and not the relative colors that would not be there if the stars were seen individually.

Target: M57, The Ring Nebula
Constellation: Lyr
Category: Deep Sky Object
Time: 20060522.2300 EDT
Comments: I think I might have seen it tonight. I was able to see all of the major stars of Lyra naked-eye.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.