12 January 2006

12 January 2006

I have had another machine go belly up. I think I have salvaged 99.44% of my data but for the time being I can't access it. That includes the current template I use for the blog. So things may look a little different here for a while.

I am switching the way I record time here. The idea of this blog originally was that someday the entries might be moved into a database where they would be more easily searchable. The date format I was using wouldn't allow entries to be easily time sequenced so I am switching to a date/time format which, it seems to me, is similar to the stardate used in Captain Kirk's log in the TV series Star Trek. From now on, or at least until I come up with a better scheme, the date will be in the format
     YYYYMMDD.HHMMss EST(EDT)

Observing
Location
TotL
Observational
Period
1915-2315 EST
Atmospheric
Conditions
The temperature was very mile, in the upper 40s, but there was a moist wind blowing out of the south that made it feel a lot cooler.

Initially the sky was clear but some clouds drifted in and there was a rainbow around the moon.

TransparencyGood
SeeingGood
Instruments SAR: Coulter CT-100 - Charlie
binocular - Kin
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Kin Lee

TargetChantal occults TYC 1843-00401-1
ConstellationTau
CategoryOccultation
Time20060112.1915 EST
CommentsThe target star was Mag 9.5 and there was only a 1% probability that it would be seen from NYC. But if I hadn't gone out to look my probability would have been 0% so I gave it a try.

The occultation was due to occur at about 2021 EST so I was there in plenty of time to get my eqyipment set up and hop to the star. With the low probability of success I traveled light tonight with just the scope, short wave radio and a recorder. I spent over an hour trying to find the star but could not find anything that looked like the starfield in Planetarium. Eventually I decided that the stars were too dim for me to see. Since I was in the neighborhood of the Pleiades I headed up there to try and determine the limiting magnitude of my scope, something I should have already done.

TargetOrion's Sword
ConstellationOri
CategoryDeep Sky Object
Time20060112.2000 EST
CommentsThere wasn't as much nebulosity visible tonight around M42/M43 as usual.


CT-100
Limiting
Magnitude
Observations
StarMagnitudeComments
TYC 1800-2192-17.79 
TYC 1800-1630-17.76 
HIP 176846.98 
HIP 176926.99 
TYC 1800-1567-17.28 
TYC 1261-611-17.15 
HIP 180596.71 
HIP 179216.05 
HIP 178927.01 
TYC 1800-118-17.73 
HIP 179287.29 
TYC 1260-800-18.19just visble
HIP 180975.57 
HIP 178288.12 
HIP 176948.17just visible
HIP 175726.85 
TYC 1800-1729-18.83I can tell there is something there but I can't see it; comes and goes
TYC 1800-1621-18.15comes and goes
HIP 178326.47 
HIP 179006.17 
HIP 179236.73 
TYC 1800-1406-18.09dim
HIP 179996.95 
Atlas3.62 
Pleione5.05 
HIP 178626.62 
TYC 1804-265-17.52 
TYC 1800-985-17.53 
TYC 1804-55-111.05I must have picked the wrong star in planetarium
TYC 1800-901-17.95 
HIP 177916.96 
TYC 1800-1546-18.23dim
HIP 177046.83 
Alcyone2.85 
TYC 1800-2201-16.27 
TYC 1800-1908-17.33 
TYC 1800-1974-17.58 
TYC 1800-1961-18.10 
TYC 1799-79-17.86 
TYC 1799-26-18.07 
TYC 1799-184-17.18 
Maia3.87 
Taygeta4.30 
Asterope5.76 
Sterope II6.43 
HIP 176646.83 
TYC 1804-1961-17.67 
TYC 1804-265-17.52 
HIP 178626.62 
HIP 180466.79 
HIP 181066.77 
TYC 1804-444-17.96 
HIP 182016.35 
HIP 181947.84 
HIP 184917.50 
TYC 1804-1699-18.59very dim; only just visible
TYC 1817-1662-111.21I must have picked the wrong star in planetarium
TYC 1804-1545-1766dim but solid
TYC 1804-1558-18.06dim but solid
TYC 1808-210-17.97dim but solid

TargetMoon
ConstellationTau
CategoryLunar
Time20060112.2115 EST
CommentsThe moon was shining bright overhead and was probably reducing my limiting magnitude since it was centrally located to everything else I was ovserving.
occultation target star
23°
 
MoonThe Pleiades, M45
42°
The Beehive, M44
26°
Orion's Swoad, M42/M43
37°

The moon looked very flat except in the "marshes" near Mare Crisium, which had a very soft appearance like moss. The views were not great due to the coma in the scope.
The SE limb was obviously not complete but not far from it indicating that we were approaching Full Moon [20060114.0449].
There were lots of rays from Tych and Copernicus. Aristarchus and a small area just above Tycho both appeared chalky white.

TargetSaturn and M44
ConstellationCnc
CategoryConjunction
Time20060112.2130 EST
CommentsPlanetarium indicated that tonight is the first of about 40 nights when Saturn and M44 will be in the same field of view in my telescope. It is really stretching my eyepiece to fit them both in right now but if I open my eye all the way and mash it into the eyepiece I can do it. The view should become more comfortable in a week or so.

There was a "star" just off the plane of the rings to Saturn's 1:00 (7:00 binocular view) that does not appear in Planetarium and is probably Titan.

Graphic from http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/blobrana/amiga/saturnmoons.htm#


CT-100
Limiting
Magnitude
Observations
StarMagnitudeComments
HIP 429706.77 
TYC 1396-259-19.63 
HIP 429938.03 
HIP 430448.26 
HIP 428538.30 
HIP 427057.90 
TYC 1395-2711-17.29 
TYC 1395-1993-17.45 
HIP 424976.59 
TYC 1395-1677-17.46 
ε Cnc6.29 
HIP 426006.77 
HIP 425786.83 
HIP 425496.42 
TYC 1395-2006-17.59 
HIP 424856.65 
HIP 425236.61 
39 Cnc6.39 
TYC 1395-2334-17.74 
TYC 1395-814-18.14 
TYC 1395-821-18.30 
TYC 1398-128-17.75 
TYC 1395-2003-17.94 

TargetMy Birthday Star
ConstellationHyd
CategoryDouble Star
Time20060112.2300 EST
CommentsIt has been a while since I checked up on my birthday star so I went out to the site in Hawaii last week to see what it is now. On 7 Jan06 it was τ1 Hyrdae, a Mag 4.6 star just past the first right angle bend of the snake's body and is 55.8 ly away. A line through the two bright stars of Leo points right at it. (I will have graphics of the location once I resurect my other machine.) Tonight I located the star which is an easily split double. It was low on the horizon when I first tried but by 2300 EST it was just cresting the trees.

When I got home I checked the Joint Astronomy Centre web site again and found that I already have a new birthday star. They say that at Mag 5.4 I should just be able to see the star naked-eye from a dark sky sight. They neglect to say that that dark sky sight needs to be in the southern hemisphere since ι Hor, in the constellation Horologium, the Clock, is near the southern celestial pole. I don't know how they figure that straight line of stars with a minor foot on it is a clock. Maybe they were thinking of a massive grandfather clock, but they certainly weren't visualizing the face of any clock I have ever seen.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.