08 December 2007

8 December 2007

This is the way humans are: We question all our beliefs, except for the ones that we really believe, and those we never think to question.

Andrew "Ender" Wiggin
in Speaker for the Dead
Orson Scott Card



Observing LocationPSC
Observational Period1300-1330 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverOvercast
Temperature43°F
WindLight Breeze
HumidityModerate
Feels LikeRaw

The forecast says that a cold front will pass through this afternoon and clear out the clouds, but that the temperature will rise to above 40°F for the first time in a week.

I had been seeing alternating sunny skies and light cirrus clouds out of my window all morning. By the time I got out to try a solar observation. I found the sky overcast without even a glow where the Sun was hiding.

The humidity is at the high end of moderate

Low0-32%
Moderate33-65%
High66-100%
and it feels very raw, especially when a breeze picks up.

The clouds thinned out a bit once but I could barely make out the Sun through the welder’s glass, although it was too intense to try observing without it.

When I got home it was clear again.

Transparencynone
Seeing
Instruments Brunton 8x21 compact binocular w/Welco gold shade 14 welder's filter - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway



Observing LocationPSC
Observational Period1430-1445 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature44°F
WindGentle Breeze
gusty
HumidityModerate
Feels LikeCold

It didn’t feel as raw as it had when I was out earlier.

TransparencyExcellent
SeeingII
Instruments Brunton 8x21 compact binocular w/Welco gold shade 14 welder's filter - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationOph
CategorySolar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20071208.1430 EST
Comments
Distance
Light Time
0.986 AU
8m 12s
Angular Size32' 28"
Altitude16.19°
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
-0.06°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
266.61°
Position Angle
(P)
13.10°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2069

According to Space Weather group 978 has rotated farther onto the surface of the sun and appears to me to be bigger and more complex, but I can’t see it. When I pull up the high resolution image it looks like there is a single spot approaching the western limb as well. Maybe that is still 977, but is a northern hemisphere spot and I think 977 was a southern hemisphere spot




NASA has again delayed the launch of Atlantis. It is now scheduled for Sunday at 1521 EST. The problem is still the same and they still don’t have any idea why it is occurring.

There are four sensors in the fuel tank that all do the same thing. The procedures say that they can’t launch unless at least three of them are working properly. I remember one time in the past when they had this problem and said that they were thinking of launching anyway because there was too much redundancy built into the system and all they really needed was two of three sensors to be working. The quote I heard on the news today said that they will make a launch decision tomorrow (I don’t know if the press briefing was this morning or yesterday) and it the condition hadn’t been corrected at that time they would delay the launch again because they would be in violation of the launch constraints. Maybe some things have changed at NASA.

I have finally gotten to the NASA web page, which must be inundated right now since it is near the previous scheduled launch, and see on the splash page that the launch is now postponed until Tuesday. But on the splash page of the shuttle section it still says that the shuttle is scheduled to launch on Thursday, 6Dec07 at 1631 EST.

Based on the formula that the shuttle launch time is advanced by 23 minutes for every day the launch is delayed I think it should be launching 69 minutes earier than it was scheduled for today or around 1540 EST on Tuesday. CalSky has not updated their site with the latest launch information yet so I can't confirm that.

At 1630 tonight NASA announced that they will attempt a launch tomorrow afternoon at 1521 EST.



Observing LocationPSC
Observational Period1900-1915 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature42°F
WindCalm
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure30.36” Hg
Rising
Feels LikeCold

It is feeling a little moist again but it really isn’t all that bad out. The RH and BP are both dropping which is strange.

TransparencyGood
SeeingI
Instruments Brunton 8x21 compact binocular - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target17P/Holmes
ConstellationPer
CategoryComet
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20071208.1900 EST
Comments I didn’t know exactly where to look so I started my search in the general area where I found the comet on Thursday and then moved down towards Perseus’ feet but didn’t see anything.

TargetAldeberan
ConstellationTau
CategoryStar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20071208.1910 EST
CommentsI saw something naked-eye with an orange tinge that didn’t look big enough or bright enough to be Mars even though it was low in the sky. When I got the binocular on it I saw the Hyades and realized it was Aldeberan, the only star I was seeing in Taurus.

TargetMars
ConstellationGem
CategoryPlanet
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20071208.1930 EST
Comments
Object
Class
Classical Planet
Elongation157.7° W
Distance
Light Time
(from Earth)
0.6 AU
4m 59s
Distance
(from Sun)
1.56 AU
Angular Size15.6"
Magnitude-1.4
Central Meridian °
Altitude13.7°
After grabbing a slice of pizza and walking up to MetOval I saw that Mars had peeked out from behind an apartment building. I looked at it briefly through tree branches in the binocular. I may run back to MetOval a little later with SAR to see if I can discern any detail.



The Morning Daylight appears plainer when you put out your Candle.

Ben Franklin



Observing LocationMO
Observational Period2030-2200 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature41° - 38° F
WindCalm
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure30.41” Hg
Rising
Feels LikeCold
Wind Chill 27°F

I had put on my down jacket since I was planning to be out longer, but I didn’t put on the long-john bottoms and suffered a bit for it.

TransparencyGood
SeeingI
Instruments SAR: Coulter CT-100 Newtonian reflector - Charlie
  • Celestron Omni 20mm (21x)
  • Celestron Omni 2x Barlow
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetMars
ConstellationGem
CategoryPlanet
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20071208.2030 EST
Comments
Object
Class
Classical Planet
Elongation157.8° W
Distance
Light Time
(from Earth)
0.6 AU
4m 59s
Distance
(from Sun)
1.56 AU
Angular Size15.6"
Magnitude-1.4
Central Meridian 14°
Altitude22.8°
Mars is big but still tiny. 231 planets would fit across my 1° FoV. Mars will be at its largest (15.9”) 16-20Dec08 and it will still take 226 planets to span the FoV. It will be at peak brightness (Mag -1.6) 15-29Dec07. The first crescent Moon even at 0.5% illuminated is Mag 14.7.

TargetM43, NGS
ConstellationOri
CategoryDSO: EmNeb
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20071208.2145 EST
CommentsI could see some nebulosity with averted vision

It seemed like everything I wanted to look at tonight was right next to an area light and I was having trouble seeing stars for the stray light getting into the eyepiece. I need to build myself a tube extension to keep light from coming in off axis through the front can and striking the lens. I also need to figure out some way of sealing off the bottom of the tube where my shroud doesn’t go all the way to the truss bar (which is uncoated aluminum so also reflective) and allows light to get right to the primary mirror when I am pointed near zenith.

I played with SAR rocking the front can in all directions and moving Mars around the FoV and the only way I could get rid of coma was to put the planet outside of the field stop in the 7:00 position and move my eye up toward 1:00 and look under the field stop. Coma is also greatly reduced when I have the chimney thumb screw loosened to focus, but as soon as I tighten the screw it cants the eyepiece to the left and coma returns. I should try lining the inside of the chimney with tape to snug up the fit and see if that helps anything.



I tried shimming the chimney with electrical tape and no matter how thin of a strip I cut there is still too much thickness to let the eyepiece slip into place and focus.

I measured the front can for an extension and it looks like I need at least 5.5” to keep off-axis light from reaching the field lens of the eyepiece.

I have a label on the front can that says my resolution is 1.2 arcseconds. But I don’t know what that means so I calculated the smallest lunar feature that I should be able to see and it has a diameter of 2.2 km (1.375 mi). That is a little more useful since Rukl, Cherrington and Grego all give crater diameters in their books.

Moon average diameter = 31.5” Moon diameter = 3475 km

Smallest Feature = (Resolution / (Diameter * 60)) * Diameter
Smallest Feature = (1.2 / (31.5 * 60)) * 3475
Smallest Feature = 1.2 / 1890 * 3475
Smallest Feature = 0.000635 * 3475 = 2.2 km

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.