26 July 2007

26 July 2007

Observing LocationVP
Observational Period1200-1215 EDT
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud Cover? w/heavy haze
Temperature81°F
WindCalm
HumidityModerate
Feels LikeHot and humid

NOAA says it is clear but it looks like there are some darker puffs of white up there in some areas than in others and when I look at the sun I can see patches of denser atmosphere moving past it.

TransparencyPoor
SeeingIII
Instruments Brunton 8x21 compact binocular w/Welco gold shade 14 welder's filter - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationTau
CategorySolar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070726.1200 EDT
Comments
Distance
Light Time
1.015599 AU
8ms
Angular Size31'32.7"
Altitude65.4°
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
5.33°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
250.33°
Position Angle
(P)
8.47°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2059

Active Region Explorer says Group 961 is still there but Space Weather doesn’t and all I can see on the SOHO image is a broad area of plage. I don’t see anything in my little binocular.

 Groups SpotsR
North0 0 0
South0 0 0
Total0 0 0
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)



I found this story about NASA wanting to bring rocks back from Mars and people being worried that other space missions are going to suffer because of it. I think they have reason to be worried. Already NASA is talking about wanting to add a collection capability to already planned missions which is going to mean redesign of the hardware. If you add the new hardware you are going to have to take something out to make room for it and to get it there within the fuel budget. That means that something is going to have to be left behind so we can pick up rocks and store them in a rover that is not going to come back from Mars. If all we want to do is proove we can pick up rocks and put them in a filing cabinet why don't we do that here on Earth? The technology that was developed for the present rovers is working perfectly well and it was developed right here and not tested in space before it was first used. This proposal seems to be a huge waste of money to me.



Observing LocationBryant Park, New York, NY
Observational Period1800-1830 EDT
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverOvercast
Temperature77°F
WindCalm
HumidityHigh
Feels LikeMuggy

There were heavy, puffy clouds covering the whole sky. I hoped a whole might appear, but it didn't.

TransparencyAbsent
Seeing
InstrumentsNaked-eye Observing
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetDaytime Iridium Flare
ConstellationLeo
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070726.1832 EDT
CommentsI was still on my quest for a daytime Irridium flare. Iridium 6 was supposed to flare at Mag 7.7 tonight at 1832 but I couldn’t even see where the sun was through the clouds.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.