24 March 2007

23 March 2007

Observing LocationVP
Observational Period1000-1015 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature50°F
WindCalm
HumidityLow
Feels Likevery pleasant

TransparencyGood
SeeingI
Instruments Brunton 8x21 compact binocular w/Welco gold shade 14 welder's filter - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationPsc
CategorySolar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20070323.1000 EST
Comments
Distance
Light Time
0.9 AU
8ms
Angular Size32'"
Altitude°
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
-6.91°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
91.00°
Position Angle
(P)
-25.61°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2054

Nothing seen.

 Groups SpotsR
North0 0 0
South0 0 0
Total0 0 0
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)




A British university has developed software to determine the most likely place for a small (<1km) asteroid to impact the earth and the likely consequences. It sounds like the earthquake and hurricane impact software the US government has developed with the addition of considering the problem from a worldwide perspective and adding in the likelihood of the event happening. The top ten countries at risk are:

  • China
  • Indonesia
  • India
  • Japan
  • United States
  • Philippines
  • Italy
  • United Kingdom
  • Brazil
  • Nigeria

I can understand China, India, the United States and Brazil being on the list just because of their sheer size. But then why aren't Canada, Russia and Australia also on the list. China, Indonesia, India, Japan and the Philippines are all fairly close to each other so that makes some sense, but then some other nearby countries should also be included to fill in the gaps. But Italy and the United Kingdom (unless you also the rest of the Commonwealth Realms: Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Jamaica; The Crown Dependencies: the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man; and the overseas territories: Bermuda, Gibraltar, Pitcairn and the Falkland Islands.) are tiny in comparison to the rest of the countries on the list, and they and and Nigeria are outliers geographically.


Base map from Houghton Mifflin Education Place, my colorization
The article doesn't say if the countries are listed in rank order but I assume they are since they are not in alphabetical order or size order.

Greatest Population LossGreatest Economic Impact
  • China
  • Indonesia
  • India
  • Japan
  • United States
  • United States
  • China
  • Sweden
  • Canada
  • Japan
The change in the order that the countries are listed leads me to believe that they are probably listed in rank order although that is not stated in the article. It is interesting that Sweden and Canada appear in the list of most highly impacted countries economically while they don't make the master threat list. A factor in the ranking is the number of times a country would be impacted and Canada does already have a large number of known impact crater sites.

I have not been able to find any information about the paper presented other than the press release form the college listed below.
New research tool indicates those countries most at risk of 'small' asteroid impact

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.