12 December 2006

9 December 2006

Observing LocationBryant Park, New York, NY
Observational Period0200-0215 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature
WindCalm
HumidityLow
Feels LikeCold

I had planned to observe from the front of the NYPL but found that the Sun was too far west to be seen from there so had to move into the park behind the library (which is built over part of the library's stacks). Even from there I was having trouble seeing the Sun and found that on my only reasonable sight line the Sun was setting into the exhaust from a chimney and the heat made observation impossible. I waited until the Sun moved past the chimney but there was still air movement from the roofs of the buildings it was setting into. It seems strange for the Sun to be dropping behind buildings this early in the day, but my calendar reminds me that the earliest sunsets of the year occur between 1Dec and 14Dec at 1628 EST.
TransparencyGood
SeeingIV
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 IS binocular w/Baader AstroSolar filter film - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationOph
CategorySolar
Time20061209.1400 EST
Comments
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
-0.21°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
31.28°
Position Angle
(P)
+12.58°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2050

 Groups SpotsR
North0 0 0
South1 1 11
Total1 1 11
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)

With the poor seeing I am sure that there was one large spot there but not much more than that. I did look for other spots around Group 930 and elsewhere. Although I was not able to see any, I would be pushing it to say that there were none.

Group 930
Heliographic Latitude -8°
Heliographic Longitude 13°
Mcintosh SystemHhx
The umbra appears very round and surrounded by a very broad penumbra. I did not detect any smaller spots in the group.



Observing LocationRobert Wagner Park, New York, NY
Observational Period1900-2200 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature
WindLight Breeze
HumidityModerate
Feels LikeCold

There were a couple of thin clouds out over the harbor but they were higher then the Space Shuttle was supposed to be. Focusing on a star just to get the binoculars focused I observed considerable scintillation.

TransparencyGood
SeeingIII
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 IS binocular - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetLaunch of Space Shuttle Discovery (STS-116)
ConstellationCet & Scl
CategorySatellite
Time20061209.2055 EST
CommentsI started out the session in the Winter Garden at the World Financial Center listening to the NASA broadcast being rebroadcast on the amateur radio. Shortly before 2030 EST I moved outdoors and began walking south looking for a place from which to make my observations. I ended up, as I thought I would, at Wagner Park just north of Pier A, the old fireboat pure that separates Battery Park from Wagner Park. In hindsight I probably should have gone all the way down to Battery Park.

I told everyone who passed about the event but most of the people in the area were foreigners who had limited command of the English language and weren't sure what I was trying to communicate. A Russian couple who has a relative who works for the Russian space industry decided to stay to see the event. I unplugged the headphones from the radio so we could all hear the countdown.

The HoSARC Repeater timed out within the last minute of the countdown and when I realized it and switched to another Repeater I found that the launch had already taken place. When they called two minutes to Main Engine Cutoff (MECO) I started scanning the skies from west to east. I quickly came across an orange spot that I suspected was the Shuttle but I wasn't certain enough of that to stay with it. A few moments later I easily saw it naked-eye and was sure that is what it was and confirmed it with the binocular.

Naked-eye it looked like a moving Aldeberan. In the binocular I could see a fan of orange light that appeared to break into individual rays of light as they moved away from the direction of travel.

I probably observed the craft through the binocular for 30-60 seconds before it disappeared behind the hose tower of the fireboat pier. MECO did not occur until after it had gone behind the firehouse so had I been south of Pier A I would have definitely seen the shuttle longer and might have observed MECO and possibly separation from the external tank. Once I had positively identified the Shuttle I alerted the Russians and they saw it naked-eye.

I hurried off to my sea chanty sing and reported over the repeater frequency that I had observed the Shuttle and one of the guys ran up to his roof to see it but this was already well after MECO.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.