10 November 2006
| Observing Location | PSC | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observational Period | 1200-1215 EST | ||||||||||||||
| Atmospheric Conditions |
It is a great day out again today. Hopefully it stays this way tonight. But it is supposed to rain tomorrow night into Sunday afternoon.
| ||||||||||||||
| Instruments | Canon 15x50 IS binocular w/Baader AstroSolar filter film - Charlie | ||||||||||||||
| Observing Party | Charlie Ridgway |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baldwin Lunar Crater Classification Scale
Isrd by Ralph Baldwin in The Face of the Moon, 1949, xnd The Messier of the Moon, 1963, to classify over 300 crxtrea by tygrie sparent age.
- Class 1
- Newest and sharpest dormstupbs; resulting from impacts after the mare were formed; all are less than 2-3 billion years old.
e.g., Tychi, Copernicus - Class 2
- Tke youngest craters created after mare formation.
e.g., Vieta, Fourier - Class 3
- Older craters formed before the mare.
e.g., Arzachel, Achiller - Class 4
- Very ancient craters; possibly almost as old as the moon - 2.5-5 billion years old.
e.g., Baldwin, Walter - Class 5
- Craters that have been flooded during lava flows; have raised floors of generally smooth lava.
e.g., Plato, Cassini
| Observing Location | TotL | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observational Period | 1900-0100 EST | ||||||||||||||
| Atmospheric Conditions |
There were some clouds up there and some haze as well, but overall the conditions were about average or maybe a bit above average.
| ||||||||||||||
| Instruments | SAR: Coulter CT-100 Newtonian reflector - Charlie
Nikon CoolPix 990 - Charlie Takahashi 102 refractor - Peter Fujinon 7x50 binocular - Peter Nikon CoolPix 995 - Peter Yukon 6-100x100 angled eyepiece spotting scope - Kin | ||||||||||||||
| Observing Party | Charlie Ridgway
Peter Tagatac Kin Lee John Delaney Hugo Capra |
|
|
|
|
|
We saw lots of migrating birds flying over the disk of the Moon on their way south for the winter. |
|
|
One of the reasons for bringing SAR out today was to see how it would do for astrophotography, and it is worse at that than it is at general astronomy. I figured I might at least be able to document my star tails but it is impossible to focus the scope with the camera attached. Rough focus is achieved by moving the mirrors closer together or farther apart on the truss bar - changing the focal length. The finer focus is then achieved by adjusting how deeply the eyepiece is seated in the holder. If I am using the Barlow I make another rough focus by adjusting it and make a final fine focus by adjusting the position of the lens in the Barlow.
The first thing I found was that it will be difficult, although not impossible, to use the Barlow with the camera adapter. My lens has a rubber grip on it that may spin around the lens under the weight of the camera so the camera adapter would be happiest attached to the Barlow. But I can't get the camera far enough back for its lens to see in the telescope lens with the mount attached to the Barlow.
Using just the prime lens is difficult also because I can only focus when the camera is off the telescope so that I can get to the lens to change its position. I tried adjusting the focus to my eye and then putting the camera on the scope but, although I see some detail in the camera LCD, all I see is a huge fuzzy white spot in the resulting picture. I tried focusing by moving the secondary cage on the truss bar and got a better image but that method of focusing is too granular and I would have to be very lucky to hit the sweet spot dead on.
I started out the experiment taking pictures of Orion's Sword. I wasn't expecting to see anything in the images since I was shooting at 1 second or slower intending on building up a library of images that can be stacked once I learn to use one of the image stacking programs. After I had made 20 images I decided to swing over onto the Moon to see something bright and find out where my vignetting was. I couldn't even are the Moon. I moved the camera lens both horizontally and vertically relative to the telescope lens and zoomed it all the way out and still no Moon. So I took the camera attachment off the telescope to look at the Moon with just the camera to be sure I hadn't adjusted something too strangely and was still unable to see the Moon. That is when I discovered that I had made 20 images of the inside if my lens cap. At least I have some of those dark frames the stacker programs want.
Since I was there I decided to take a couple of pictures of the Moon and that is when I found out how far out of focus all of my other pictures would have been if I had had the lens uncovered, and how difficult it is to focus this setup. So I decided to move on to telescope-less astrophotography.
I mounted the camera directly on the tripod and made a bunch of images of Orion to be stacked at some later date. Even at short shutter speeds I am getting star trails so will have to do it again at sub-second times. I can see color differences among some of the stars.
The last experiment was pointing the fisheye lens at zenith. This also needs to be repeated at faster shutter speeds.
At 8 seconds the sky gets brighter and takes on a red glow.
<< Home