24 August 2006

24 August 2006

Observing LocationPSC
Observational Period1200-1215 EDT
Atmospheric ConditionsHot and humid with a moderate breeze; haze and fast moving cirrus.
TransparencyFair
SeeingGood

It is not looking good for sighting the first crescent Moon tonight.

CSC graphic

NOAA graphic
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 IS binocular w/Baader AstroSolar filter film - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationLeo
CategorySolar
Time20060824.1200 EDT
Comments
905
The p-spot appears to be two spots in a common penumbra. The f-spot does not appear to have a penumbra. Both spots appear stretched parallel to the equator, but the appearance is more striking in the f-spot, which is also not as dark.

 Groups SpotsR
North0 0 0
South1 3 13
Total1 3 13
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)



I have seen news articles today that indicate that Pluto may still be a planet and others that say that it defiantly is not. None of the articles are citing an official IAU press release or any other source for that matter so I don't know who to believe.

It sounds like the scientists voting in Prague were given a choice of proposals to choose from. One of them appears to be the original IAU proposal without the top level categorization, Planet, and adding in that there can't be any other stuff in the planet's orbit.

I am still taking the position that nothing has been decided until there has been an official IAU press release (the IAU web site appears to be getting hammered with requests and I can'’t get in). In the immortal words of the San Antonio sportscaster Dan Cook:

The opera ain't over until the fat lady sings.



Well, here is the skinny, direct from the IAU conference mirror Web site.

All of the resolutions the executive committee put forth were passed including the four listed below concerning the definition of the word “planet” and its implications for out solar system. The other resolutions concerned

  • Resolution 1 for GA-XXVI : "Precession Theory and Definition of the Ecliptic"
  • Resolution 2 for GA-XXVI: "Supplement to the IAU 2000 Resolutions on reference systems"
  • Resolution 3 for GA-XXVI: "Re-definition of Barycentric Dynamical Time, TDB"
  • Resolution 4 for GA-XXVI: "Endorsement of the Washington Charter for Communicating Astronomy with the Public"
I would like to read resolution 1 but haven't found a link to it.

The IAU members gathered at the 2006 General Assembly agreed that a "planet" is defined as a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

This means that the Solar System consists of eight "planets" Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. A new distinct class of objects called "dwarf planets" was also decided. It was agreed that "planets" and "dwarf planets" are two distinct classes of objects. The first members of the "dwarf planet" category are Ceres, Pluto and 2003 UB313 (temporary name). More "dwarf planets" are expected to be announced by the IAU in the coming months and years. Currently a dozen candidate "dwarf planets" are listed on IAU's "dwarf planet" watchlist, which keeps changing as new objects are found and the physics of the existing candidates becomes better known.

The "dwarf planet" Pluto is recognised as an important proto-type of a new class of trans-Neptunian objects. The IAU will set up a process to name these objects.

RESOLUTIONS
Resolution 5A is the principal definition for the IAU usage of "planet" and related terms. Resolution 5B adds the word "classical" to the collective name of the eight planets Mercury through Neptune.

Resolution 6A creates for IAU usage a new class of objects, for which Pluto is the prototype. Resolution 6B introduces the name "plutonian objects" for this class. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines "plutonian" as:
Main Entry: plu to ni an
Pronunciation: plu-'tO-nE-an
Function: adjective Usage: often capitalized
: of, relating to, or characteristic of Pluto or the lower world

After having received inputs from many sides -- especially the geological community -- the term "Pluton" is no longer being considered.

IAU Resolution: Definition of a Planet in the Solar System
Contemporary observations are changing our understanding of planetary systems, and it is important that our nomenclature for objects reflect our current understanding. This applies, in particular, to the designation 'planets'. The word 'planet' originally described 'wanderers' that were known only as moving lights in the sky. Recent discoveries lead us to create a new definition, which we can make using currently available scientific information.

RESOLUTION 5A
The IAU therefore resolves that planets and other bodies in our Solar System be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:

(1) A planet1 is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

(2) A dwarf planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape2, (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.

(3) All other objects3 orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar System Bodies".

1The eight planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
2An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.
3These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.

RESOLUTION 5B
Insert the word "classical" before the word "planet" in Resolution 5A, Section (1), and footnote 1. Thus reading:

(1) A classical planet1 is a celestial body . . .

and

1The eight classical planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.

IAU Resolution: Pluto

RESOLUTION 6A
The IAU further resolves:

Pluto is a dwarf planet by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects.

RESOLUTION 6B
The following sentence is added to Resolution 6A:

This category is to be called "plutonian objects."

Condensing the four resolutions into one statement I come up with the following:
Planets and other bodies in our Solar System be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:

(1) A classical planet1 is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

(2) A dwarf planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape2, (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.

(3) All other objects3 orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar System Bodies".

Pluto is a dwarf planet by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects. This category is to be called "plutonian objects."

1The eight classical planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
2An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.
3These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.

So here is how it all shakes out:

Classical PlanetDwarf PlanetSmall Solar System Body
  Plutonian Objects 
Mercury   
Venus   
Earth   
Mars   
 (1) Ceres  
Jupiter   
Saturn   
Uranus   
Neptune   
  Pluto 
  2003 UB313 (Xena) 
   everything else
  • comets
  • asteroids
  • Trans-Neutonian Objects (NTOs)
  • other small bodies

The history of Pluto from National Public Radio

The NPR article points out that Pluto can't be a planet because it's orbit overlaps that of Neptune so it hasn't cleared its orbit of all other objects. But can't we look at this from the other side as well? Neptune's orbit overlaps that of Pluto so it hasn't cleared its orbit of all other objects so it can't be a planet. Saturn has rings that are not part of the planet. Jupiter has what, 63 moons that are in its orbit. And what about that rocky body orbiting the Earth? Isn't it in Earth's orbit? So is the Earth a planet or is it just another dwarf planet? Mercury and Venus, being the only planets without other known objects sharing their orbit are the only two classical planets by the IAU definition. Earth through 2004 UB313 are dwarf planets.

And if a dwarf planet is not a planet why does it have the word planet it its name. That either defines it as a planet or creates a linguistic ambiguity for both classical planets and dwarf planets.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.