14 March 2006

14 March 2006

I found a little more information about the Celestron SkyScout today. It appears that nobody has actually used, probably even held, one of these things since there are no reviews for it. Everything you read on the Web is the hype from Celestron with a ship date of this month. The few people who have actually seen it must have watched a Celestron rep demo it at one of the trade shows.

I managed to find this I4U News interview with Celestron at the 2006 Consumer Electronics Show.

It is a terrible interview from a marketing point of view. During the three minute uncut interview the Celestron rep regerred to the unit as IT. Neither he nor the interviewer ever used the name of the device at all. From the demonstration it appears that you sight on an object through the device then push a button and have to take the device away from your eye to read about the object in the LCD screen on the side of the unit. It looks like the objective end has about a 2-3" aperture. He said that it will "launch at 399" which sounds like he is quoting a MSRP although the web indicates that it is $417.95.


Observing
Location
Hall of Science, Corona Park, Flushung Meadows, Flushing, NY
Lat: 40.74729760342077, Long: -73.85119199752808
Observational
Period
1800-1915 EST
Atmospheric
Conditions
Early today CSC was predicting clear and perfectly transparent skies. By the time I left the house for Queens they had backed away from that forecast and were predicting up to 70% cloud cover and even poor transparency for an hour.

There were a few isolated clouds but less than 10% cloud cover. There was some haze but it was very light. The wind was strong and made it feel very cold. It also meant there was some boiling on the limb of the moon.

La Guardia Airport
Time Wind
Dir
Speed
Gusts
Vis Colud
Cover
Temp.
1751 EST W
24 mph
33 mph
10 m Mostly
Cloudy
50ºF
1851 EST W
20 mph
36 mph
10 m Partly
Cloudy
48ºF
1951 EST W
18 mph
28 mph
10 m A Few
Clouds
46ºF

TransparencyExcellent
SeeingGood

When I got out of my meeting at 2200 EST the sky was 23-50% covered by broken cumulus clouds.

I think at 1800 EST conditions were much better than the last CSC predictionn I saw. At 2200 EST they were better so I will say overall they were much better.

The weather service has a high wind warning in effect for tomorrow. I didn't notice it earlier today but I wouldn't be surprised if there had been one in effect for today also. Sustained winds peaked out at 23 mph today in Central Park with the highest gust registering 36 mph. La Guardia always seems to be windier and their peak sustained wind was 30 mph with their highest gust at 43 mph.

Instruments Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway

TargetIridium Flare
Constellation
CategorySatellite
Time20060314.1810 EST
CommentsNot Seen
I watched for this Mag -7 flare from 1805 EST until 1815 EST and didn't see anything. I could see much dimmer Spica so the Iridium must have been behind a cloud.

TargetPenumbral Lunar Eclipse
ConstellationLib
CategoryLunar
Time20060314.1820 EST
CommentsWhen I first saw the moon I was in the parking lot at the north end of the Hall of Science. The moon was rising behind a modern statue of a plane making a very nice picture.

1822 EST
The shadow was visible on the south limb and did not extend as far up as Tycho.
1849 EST
At the time of maximum eclipse the moon was emerging from behind clouds. The snudge was as far up as Tycho. It was not very imressive and actuall looked better naked-eye. The smudge seems to be darker west of Tycho

TargetISS Visible Pass
ConstellationAri, Tau, Ori, Mon, Hya
CategorySatellite
Time20060314.1833 EST
CommentsI moved from the parking lot behind the Hall of Science through an open fence into a grassed area and up a rise overlooking the Grand Central Parkway. From this location I could see very low to the horizon in all directions.

The ISS was already high up when I first sighted it. It passed half way between orange Mars and orange Aldeberan, a few degrees above orange Betelgeuse and half way between white Procyon and white Spica. After it had pssed Procyon and was moving away it gave the appearance of continually reducing speed. Eventually it faded out above the aviary.

This is the rough path of the ISS through Taurus, Orion and Monoceros.


Annotated Distant Suns graphic

The following finder chart from Heavens-Above.com shows the actual track of the ISS.


Heavens-Above.com graphic

This is more like what I saw in the sky (minus the ISS).


Cartes du Ciel graphic

This was hands down the best sight of the night.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.