25 February 2006

25 February 2006

Peter and I are in the early planning stages of an expedition to try to observe the newly discovered comet C/2006 A1 (Pojmanski) which is now a naked-eye object in a dark sky. It is supposed to make its best showing Monday morning then gradually fade over the coming week. Unfortunately it is low on the horizon where we normally have clouds. We are going to have to try to make out attempt tomorrow morning from Carl Schurz Park. After the comet rises near Venus the 3% illuminated last crescent Moon will rise followed by the Sun.

The weather is not supposed to be great for tomorrow morning. Although the cloud cover will only be around 30%, still higher than would be good for a low altitude event, the temperature will be in the 20s with winds also in the 20s and a wind chill dropping down to 8°F.


NOAA graphic

Finder chart


Royal Astronomical Society of New Zealand graphic

I set Planetarium to display the location of Pojmanski at 0600 EST and then used Alt/Az to change the FOV center to the nearest whole degree values (138/13). Then I used timestep to back up in ten-minute intervals and found that Venus was in my FOV circles at 0530 EST. So if I go out and set up at 0530 EST with Venus in the FOV will the comet then be in the FOV at 0600 EST? It seems to make sense to me but I may be missing something.

TimeEvent
0410 ESTVenus rises
0443 ESTC/2006 A1 (Pojmanski) rises
0503 ESTAstronomical Twilight begins
0530 ESTVenus at Alt 12.75°, Az 138.07°M
0535 ESTNautical Twilight begins
0600 ESTC/2006 A1 (Pojmanski) at Alt 12.51°, Az 136.83°M
0602 ESTMoon rises
0607 ESTCivil Twilight begins
0634 ESTSunrise

I haven't found anything more recent but at http://www.fg-kometen.de/C2006A1/06a1eaus.htm I found a prediction that if the comet continued to increase in brightness as it had been at the time of writing of that page, and it has, it would peak out around now at Mag 5.2 with a visual tail of about 2.5° (about 1.2 FOV in my binocular and the full FOV in SAR).

The New Comet Observation Home page: Recent News and Observations indicates that Pojmanski had reahced about Mag 5.2 yesterday and the tail was estimated to have been 1.25° long on the 21st.

More Information
Summary of observations with pictures
Observing report from the Possum Observatory (New Zealand) with some great pictures
Space.com article by Joe Rao (24Feb06)


One last check on the weather before heading to bed.

CSC is predicting clear skies, average transparency and bad seeing for 0500 EST tomorrow.


Clear Skies Clock graphic

NOAA is indicating that the wind chill will be down around 5°F at 0500 EST tomorrow. Cloud cover is now predicted to be down around 20% with 50% relative humidity. The wind will be a killer at 20 MPH but is supposed to be out of the NW so should be at out backs most of the time.


NOAA graphic

I already have hot chocolate powder in the thermos bottle waiting for boiling water. I just hope I will be able to move after putting on all my layers of warm clothes.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.