31 May 2005

31 May 2005

Observing
Location
Parkchester South Condominium, The Bronx, NY
Observational
Period
1545-1615 EDT
Atmospheric
Conditions
It was clear this morning then we got a few passing clouds this afternoon. While I was observing I think I spent more time waiting for the building cumulus to move off the sun than I did actually looking at the sun. The temperature was around 77 with a light breeze so it was comfortable just sitting there on a park bench. But I was really warm by the time I got home from the library and dinner.
Instruments Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars with Baader AstroSolar filter film - Charlie
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway

TargetSunspots
ConstellationTau
CategorySolar
Time31May05; 1545 EDT
CommentsNone of the spots have penumbras around them today. The more complex spots in the Southern Hemisphere are surrounded by a void in the granular structure of the photosphere
767
Group 767 is approaching the western limb of the Sun in the Southern Hemisphere. It is a complex of tow larger spots with smaller spots between them. There is no penumbra but a void is visible in the granular structure of the photosphere.
771
Group 771 appears to me as a single small spot, a pore a little ways off the western limb in the Northern Hemisphere.
770
Group 770 appears to me as another pore and is closer to the equator but in the Northern Hemisphere. It over half way from the limb toward the center of the Sun's disc.
unnumbered
A group of three small spots in rotating onto the face of the Sun from the eastern limb. They are south of the equator. As of yet they do not have a number listed on SpaceWeather.com. The SOHO imagery is only showing two close spots preceded by a good distance by a pore but I clearly say three spots in an arc and did not see the pore.


I have either got bad position data for the north pole or have not drawn my diagram properly because my sunspots are not all in the right hemispheres.

NASA SOHO MDI image, north up
 GroupsSpotsR
Northern
Hemisphere
2222
Southern
Hemisphere
2626
Total4848
NOAA Boulder Sunspot Number76


Observing
Location
TotL
Observational
Period
1945-0100 EDT
Atmospheric
Conditions
There were dense clouds to the north and west when I arrived but they broke up around 2100 EDT and were not a problem after that. Transparency was not great but then I did see the fifth star of Corvus down to the SSW so it must not have been too bad. There was no wind and the temperature only dropped to 57 which wasn't too bad until 2355 EDT when the humidity skyrocketed. I wonder if sprinklers kicked off at that time somewhere where I could not hear them and injected additional moisture into the air. The infield sprinklers around TotL started up about five minutes later.
Instruments Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway

TargetVenus
ConstellationTau
CategoryPlanets
Time31May05; 2000 EDT
CommentsNot Seen
I scanned the western horizon about where I thought Venus should be but there was nothing there but clouds. I couldn't even tell if the Sun had set yet.

TargetRainbow
Constellation
CategoryWeather
Time31May05; 1950 EDT
CommentsWhile scanning the western horizon for Venus I picked up a rainbow in the top of a cumulus cloud. It was being lit from behind.

TargetJupiter
ConstellationVir
CategoryPlanets
Time31May05; 2023
CommentsJupiter was the first object to appear. I was scanning the sky for it before sunset using my binoculars but was not able to locate it. At 2023 EDT I caught a glint of light high up to the south and when I put my binoculars on it I found that it was big and round rather than being the reflection from the underside of a high flying plane. It looked huge, like a white light shining through a perfectly round hole punched in a sheet of blue paper, and about the size of a capital "O" on my screen. No moons were visible at that time but at 2042 EDT I did see Europa on the leading edge and Io following and then Callisto far out and below the plane. Planetarium said Ganymede was transiting at the time. But my other programs indicate that Ganymede was near Io.

Graphic from JavaScript AstroTools' Jupiter Tool.

This image from Starry Night Starter does not show the plane of the planets in the observed orientation.

This Starry Night Starter screen capture with the time advanced to 2200 EDT is more in line with what I observed. I can not explain the discrepancy since all programs were set for the correct coordinate and time references.

TargetPorrima
ConstellationVir
CategoryStar
Time31May05; 2038 EDT
CommentsWhile observing Jupiter in the binoculars Porrima became evident but was not seen naked-eye until 2050 EDT.

TargetSpica
ConstellationVir
CategoryStars
Time31May05; 2050 EDT
CommentsSpica became visible naked-eye.

TargetSaturn
ConstellationGem
CategoryPlanets
Time31May05; 2050 EDT
CommentsSaturn finally became visible naked-eye, followed by Pollux and lastly Castor which had been on the edge of the cloud shield.
Saturn appeared very flat on its right edge and rounded on the left.

TargetArcturus & Mufrid
ConstellationBootes
CategoryStars
Time31May05; 2058 EDT
CommentsArcturus was seen naked eye followed a minute later by Mufrid.

TargetDeneb
ConstellationCyg
CategoryStars
Time31May05; 2103 EDT
CommentsDeneb was visible naked eye low over the trees to the north in heavy haze. In the binoculars it looked like an emergency light on a federal police car flashing blue and white. γ Cyg was visible in the binoculars but no other Cygnus stars.

TargetVega
ConstellationLyr
CategoryStars
Time31May05; 2115 EDT
CommentsThe clouds are starting to dissipate and Vega is now visible naked-eye.

TargetBig Dipper
ConstellationUMa
CategoryAsterism
Time31May05; 2115 EDT
CommentsAll of the bright stars of the Big Dipper plus Alcor are visible.

TargetLittle Bear
ConstellationUMi
CategoryCostellation
Time31May05; 2117 EDT
CommentsPolaris, Kochab and Pherkad are visible as usual and I think I am just seeing ζ UMi.

TargetAlphecca, &alpha CrB
ConstellationCrB
CategoryStars
Time31May05; 2117 EDT
CommentsVisible naked-eye.

TargetSpot 4 Rocket
Constellation
CategorySatellite
Time31May05; 2129
CommentsNot Seen

TargetCosmos 1154 Rocket
ConstellationBoo
CategorySatellite
Time31May05; 2130 EDT
CommentsThis Mag. 3.8 satellite was seen flying north to south in the neighborhood of Bootes and was followed for about 40º.

TargetIridium 16
ConstellationHer
CategorySatellite
Time31May05; 2135 EDT
CommentsNot Seen
I don't know how I missed a Mag. -8 flare. I was looking a little higher than I should have been (I calculated it to be between Bootes' club and the second loop of Draco) but a -8 should have caught my eye no matter where I was looking.

TargetUnknown Satellite
ConstellationCyg
CategorySatellite
Time31May05; 2145 EDT
CommentsI observed a satellite pass near η Cyg; There was no satellite listed in Heavens-Above.com for this time. Orbitron shows a satellite (SL-3 Rocket) low on the horizon to the NE tracking counterclockwise at that time.

Graphic from Orbitron.

Targetχ Cyg
ConstellationCyg
CategoryVariable Stars
Time31May05; 2050 EDT
CommentsThis is a long period variable star that is supposed to be a good starter star for new variable star observers. I foud a formula for calculating the magnitude of a variable star by comparing it to the magnitude of tow nearby stars and wanted to give it a try. I wasn't able to find what the official comparison stars are (they should be in the same field of view, within .5 of a magnitude of the variable, one brighter and one dimmer, and of the same spectral type) so picked 17 Cyg as my bright star and Yale 7535 as my dim star. I used the magnitude values from Planetarium for the calculations in the field and recalculated it at home vased on the values from Cartes du Ciel (which really may not be any more accurate but the deeper star catalog makes you feel better). The recalculation resulted in a change in the estimate of 0.01 mag to the dimmer. I don't know how close to the real magnitude I came since I don't know where to find that information for a variable star at a point in time.
StarMag.Observation
17 Cyg5.003
Faint difference observed at first sight.
Yale 75356.185
Big difference observed at first sight.
χ Cyg5.44A 3 V 5 B

Target50 Vir
ConstellationVir
CategoryStar
Time31May05; 2210 EDT
CommentsI tried calculating the magnitude of a star I know the magnitude of to see how close I come to the actual value using the formula. There is a "k" factor that relates to size of your optics and your observing experience that I have not included in my formula since I haven't found a site that says how to calculate it. For small optics and inexperienced observers it should be >1 but I don't know how much >.
I calculated the brightness of 50 Vir at 6.06. Planetarium lists it at 5.96.
StarMag.Observation
49 Vir5.213
Faint difference observed at first sight.
Yale 49596.341
Faint difference after extended observation.
χ Cyg6.06A 3 V 1 B

TargetUnknown Satellite
ConstellationCrB
CategorySatellite
Time31May05; 2238 ECT
CommentsI was looking in CrB to see if I could find some stars to test the magnitude estimation on and a satellite flew through my field of view heading south. There is nothing listed in Heavens-Above.com for this timeframe and I don't see anything in that location on Orbitron.

Target17 Lyr
ConstellationLyr
CategoryStar
Time31May05; 2240 EDT
CommentsI tried comparing 17 Lyr with γ Lyr and Yale 7237 to estimate its brightness. I came up with 5.37 and the value given in Planetarium is 5.25. This is the second star that I have estimated as dimmer than its known value.
StarMag.Observation
γ Lyr4.952
Faint difference is easily evident.
Yale 49595.581
Faint difference after extended observation.
χ Cyg5.37A 2 V 1 B

TargetLeo
ConstellationLeo
CategoryConstellation
Time31May05; 2305
CommentsI saw Regulus and Algieba and a few brighter stars south of them and had no idea what I was looking at. It wasn't until I pulled them up in Planetarium that I was able to construct Leo out of them. I was not expecting Leo to be so far west and diving down on the eclyptic.
Algieba appears to be a double star with 40 Leo with a big magnitude difference (2.5:1). The primary is yellow and the secondary blue.

TargetComa Berineces Cluster
ConstellationCom
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time31May05; 2315 EDT
CommentsI could only find Denebola, Arcturus and Cor Caroli so ended up tracking up and slewing to the south to find this. The stars appeared bright and the cluster spilled over the edges of my 4.5º FOV.

Graphic from Starry Nights Starter Edition

TargetAlberio
ConstellationCyg
CategoryDouble Star
Time31May05; 2320 EDT
CommentsA tight double. The primary us gold and the secondary turquoise.

TargetThe Coathanger
ConstellationVul
CategoryAsterism
Time31May05; 2330 EDT
CommentsThw coathanger was nearly in the trees to the NE. There were no naked eye guide stars available that low in the haze so I found it by brute force slewing from Alberio.

Targetω1 Sco & ω2 Sco
ConstellationSco
CategoryDouble Star
Time31May05; 2333 EDT
CommentsA very wide double in the left claw of Scorpius. The components are fairly equal although ω2 appears a little dimmer (3.98 vs 4.34 or 1.4:2). They both appear to be white.

Targetγ sco & υ Sco
ConstellationSco
CategoryStars
Time31May05; 2345 EDT
CommentsThese are the two bright stars at the top of the tail of the scorpion (the Sting). They were in a notch in the top of one of the trees very low on the horizon.
I saw an unlabeled cluster so dim stars to the N of the Sting in Planetarium and thought it must be something. It turns out to be M7. I tried to find it but couldn't even find the bright stars of the teapot of Sagittarius that low on the horizon.

TargetCosmos 1
ConstellationCrB
CategorySatellite
Time1Jun05; 0043 EDT
CommentsNot Seen
I missed Mag.ag 1.4 satellite. I didn't see anything in motion heading from near the zenith in the west fo the horizon in the north.

I was approached by Dove and Chris who have just purchased a GoTo. They wanted me to point out some bright stars for them because they are trying to do a two-star alignment and don't know the heavens. I suggested they bring the scope by some time and someone would help them if we are there.

The sprinklers at the edge of the Lawn have been relocated and are all messed up. They are now located around the north edge of the Lawn in the neighborhood of the gate, right where we set up. They went off at 0005 EDT and soaked by backpack and tripod bag and got water spots on the front lenses of my binoculars. The head just to the left of the gate shoots into the fence on both ends of its travel so you can't put anything near the fence. The last head to the east is about opposite the lamp post with the fire call box on it. That one points across the walk and does not move at all. They kicked off at 0005 and shut down at 0040 EDT. The outside edge of the walk is safe as there are no sprinkler heads on the north ballfields and the ones on the Lawn don't reach that far (at least not in a calm wind). That ended my serious observing.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.