14 April 2005

13 April 2005

Observing
Location
TotL
Observational
Period
2030-0100 EDT
Atmospheric
Conditions
There were no clouds to speak of tonight but there was a haze and I noted at least once that I had to wait to view a particular starfield. The temperature got down to around 40 but it felt colder. There was some wind. There was a lot of boiling when we were observing the moon in the scope. Peter didn't feel he was seeing as deep as normal. I would say transparency and seeing were only fair tonight.
Instruments Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
Teleport 10" Dobsonian Refractor - Peter
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Peter Tagatac

TargetMoon
ConstellationTau
CategoryLunar
Time13Apr05; 2045 EDT
CommentsThe moon was sitting just off of &beta Tau tonight. I was going to try for M36, M37 and M38 nearby in Aur tonight but figured the glow of the moon would make them too hard to see since they are not easy for me anyway.

I traced the path of the terminator and identified the following features:

FeatureType
Herculescrater
Lacus Somniorummare
Lillrowcrater
Mare Tranquillitatismare
Maskelynecrater
Mare NectarisFracastorius
Piccolominicrater w/central peak
Stiboriuscrater
We spent some time with Peter's scope observing a crater at the top of Mare Nectaris [Fracastorius] that appears to have a broken wall and an arc of craters and maybe domes that ended up on the floor of Mare Nectaris. There was also an area that looked like domes or mountains diagonally across the mare.

TargetM67, NGC2682
ConstellationCnc
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05, 2137 EDT
CommentsThe Atlas of Deep-Sky Splendors says the integrated brightness of 6.1 places it at the limits of naked-eye observability so it should be something I can see in the binoculars. I have observed here before and feel that there is something in the same location but it is difficult for me to resolve.


TargetEskimo (Clown Face) Nebula, NGC2392
ConstellationGom
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2209
CommentsA planetary nebula. Seen in Peter's scope. The voice recorder got bumped off so I don't have any notes about it.

TargetNGC5466
ConstellationBoo
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2223 EDT
CommentsI don't remember seeing this, and don't hear anything describing it on the voice recorder, although I was over it. There was, however, a dot and a label in my field drawing for the object. It is along the star hop up to M3.

TargetM3, NGC5272
ConstellationBoo
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2332 EDT
CommentsVery easy. Easier with averted vision but it also took direct.

TargetGhost of Jupiter, NGC3242
ConstellationHya
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2220 EDT
Comments

TargetSpindle Galaxy, NGC3115
ConstellationSex
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2235 EDT
CommentsAn isolese triangle of dim stars. The most distant of the stars doesn't resolve to a point. I didn't detect a shape.

TargetLeo Trio
ConstellationLeo
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2256 EDT
CommentsThree galaxies under Chort, M65, M66 and NGC3628. I sensed two areas where the sky felt funny but didn't actually see anything that looked lake a galaxy. Peter didn't see anything.


TargetMeteor
Constellation
CategoryMeteor
Time13Apr05 2323 EDT
CommentsThis one was heading N to S so must be a sporadic.

TargetM95, M96, & M105
ConstellationLeo
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2330 EDT
CommentsNot seen.


TargetSerpens Caput, Head of the Serpent
ConstellationSer
CategoryConstellations
Time13Apr05; 2345 EDT
CommentsTonight was my first time seeing Serpens. It was over the trees and to the right of Corona Borealis. I could see a triangle of stars and follow a line out to the right and down into the trees.
StarMagnitudeMeaning
Common NameBayer Designation
 ι Ser4.54 
 κ Ser4.11 
 γ Ser3.87 
 β Ser3.69 
 δ Ser3.82 
Unukalhaiα Ser2.67serpent's neck
 ε Ser3.73 


TargetM5, NGC5904
ConstellationSer
CategoryDeep Sky Objects
Time13Apr05; 2348 EDT
CommentsA big fuzzy ball.

TargetLittle Dipper
ConstellationUMi
CategoryConstellation
Time14Apr05; 0000 EST
CommentsWe saw all the stars of the Little Dipper tonight.
StarMagnitudeMeaning
Common NameBayer Designation
Polarisα UMi2.00pole star
Yildunδ UMi4.38star
 &epsilon' UMi4.25 
 ζ UMi4.34 
Kochabβ UMi2.10unknown
Pherkadγ UMi3.07two calves
 η UMi4.97 
Mag 4.27 UMi was easily seen but Pherkad Minor at Mag 5.04 was not.

Target02 Pallas
ConstellationCom
CategoryAsteroids
Time14Apr05; 0010 EDT
CommentsTonight Pallas appeared closer to the apex or the skinny triangle and on the left arm. That doesn't stack with the star chart below but it does agree with what Planetarium shows. I will need to check it again to see if I have misidentified a field star or if there is a problem with the software.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.