06 March 2005

5 March 2005

Observing
Location
TotL
Observational
Period
1830-1900 EST
Atmospheric
Conditions
It was nice and clear, mild temperatures and light wind. There was a white glow on the horizon but the sky was starting to get dark up where Mercury was. I saw deeper into Orion than I have seen for quite some time.
Instruments
16x70 binoculars - Tom
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Tom Clabough

Naked-eye
Limiting
Magnitude
Observations
StarMagnitude
Faintest Star Seen5.29
μ Ori4.14
52 Ori5.29
Betelgeuse
α Ori
0.70
Meissa
λ Ori
3.56
φ1 Ori4.43
φ2 Ori4.11
Bellatrix
γ Ori
1.60
32 Ori4.22
π3 Ori3.21
π4 Ori3.71
π2 Ori4.38
Alnitak
ζ Ori
2.07
Alnilam
ε Ori
1.72
Mintaka
δ Ori
2.25
η Ori3.38
Running Man Nebula
NGC 1977
4.2
The Trapezium
M42 & M43
 
Nair al Saif
ι Ori
2.79
τ Ori3.62
Rigel
β Ori
0.10
29 Ori4.16
Saiph
κ Ori
2.08
3 Mon4.97
μ Lep3.33
ε Lep3.21
Nihal
β Lep
2.86
Algieba
γ Lep
2.60
δ Lep3.83
Mursim
β CMa
2.00
ο1 CMa3.89
Adhara
ε CMa
1.50
σ CMa3.49
Wezen
δ CMa
1.86
Aludra
η CMa
2.47
ο2 CMa3.04
Sirius
&alpha CMa
-1.50
Aldeberan
α Tau
0.90
θ1 Tau3.86
θ2 Tau3.42
Hyadum I
γ Tau
3.67
Hyadum II
&delta1 Tau
3.78
δ3 Tau4.31
Ain
ε Tau
3.55
ζ Tau3.02
Alnath
β Tau
1.67
The Pleiades
M45
 

TargetMercury
ConstellationPsc
CategoryPlanets
Time5Mar05; 1830 EST
CommentsJoe Rao's article in Space.com indicates that you should start observing 45 minutes after sunset which would have been at 1837 but the planet was already easily visible to the naked eye at 1830 when I arrived in the park. It was at magnitude -1.0.
More Mercury information.

TargetSaturn
ConstellationGem
CategoryPlanets
Time5Mar05; 1850 EST
CommentsWe could see the planet and various moons around it.



Observing
Location
TotL
Observational
Period
2130-0130 EST
Atmospheric
Conditions
Conditions had deteriorated markedly over the past three hours and got worse yet. Clouds were starting to roll in but did not become really bothersome until around midnight. The temperature was in the low 30s to high 20s with a light wind from the N-NW.
Instruments Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
Fujinon 7x50 binoculars - Ben
10" Teleport - Peter
8-25x25 binoculars - Ken
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Ben Cacace
Peter Tagatac
Ken (cyclist)

TargetPuppis
ConstellationPup
CategoryConstellation
Time5Mar05; 2205 EST
CommentsPuppis was low on the S-SW horizon so was in an area og bad light pollution as welll as dense atmosphere. I was only able to find three stars.
StarMagnitudeMeaning
Tureisρ Pup2.83 
Azmidiskeξ Pup3.36 
 Yale 29224.66 

TargetSaturn
ConstellationGem
CategoryPlanets
Time5Mar05; 2230 EST
CommentsI got a brief look at Saturn in Peter's scope. I didn't look closely enough to see the Cassini division, shadow on the rings or banding on the planet, but moons were obvious.

TargetM3
ConstellationCVn
CategoryDeep Space Objects
Time5Mar05; 2235 EST
CommentsIt wasn't very impressive in my binoculars. Just a fuzzy ball with nothing much around it. I got to it by hopping off of ρ Boo.

TargetAlkalurops, μ Boo
ConstellationBoo
CategoryDouble Stars
Time5Mar05; 22 EST
CommentsA wide double off the left corner of the kite. The primary is white and the secondary orange.

Targetδ Boo
ConstellationBoo
CategoryDouble Stars
Time5Mar05; 22 EST
CommentsA close double that is the left corner of the kite. The secondary is much dimmer than the primary.

TargetCoroa Borealis (The Northern Crown)
ConstellationCrB
CategoryConstellation
Time5Mar05; 2255 EST
CommentsI could only make out Alphecca, α Crb, naked-eye. With the binoculars I could see the whole crown.

TargetC/2004 Q2 (Machholz)
ConstellationCep
CategoryComets
Time5Mar05; 2300 EST
CommentsMachholz becomes less impressive all the time. It is now so faint that I have to star hop to it. It is just a slight blur in the sky.

TargetThe Engagement Ring
ConstellationUMi
CategoryAsterism
Time5Mar05; 2300 EST
CommentsI wsa not able to find the ring tonight. I don't remember if I have seen it before in these binoculars or in the 7x binoculars.

Targetν Draconis
ConstellationDra
CategoryDouble Stars
Time
CommentsThis is the left eye of the dragon.

Target16 & 17 Draconis
ConstellationDra
CategoryDouble Stars
Time5Mar05; 2306 EST
CommentsThis is a very wide double. It is Mag 5.4. I saw a spot of light where I suspected I would find the double star and pointed the binoculars at it and the double was nearly in the center of the field. There are no brighter stars close to it so I must have been seeing the double itself. One reference lists them at 5.4 and planetarium lists the individual stars at 17 Dra: 5.10 and 16 Dra: 5.55 so their combined light might be brighter than 5.0.

[Ben reports: The combined mags for a 5.1 and 5.55 pair is 4.55. Since this is a very wide double I suspect the visual magnitude is less than 4.55 but greater than 5.4.]


Targetψ Draconis
ConstellationDra
CategoryDouble Stars
Time5Mar05; 2310 EST
CommentsA Mag 4.9 double at the second turn in Draco.

TargetM13
ConstellationHer
CategoryDeep Space Objects
Time5Mar05; 2345 EST
CommentsI was trying to find M92 in Hercules but Peter didn't think Hercules was up yet. After a long discussion about where things were we finally agreed on what could be seen. I had my binoculars where I thought they were but wasn't associating what I was seeing in them with what I was able to see naked-eye. I never did find M92 but was able to find the Mag 5.8 globular cluster M13 to the right of η Her. In the binoculars it was just a faint smudge. I came back to the M92 neighborhood later and neither Ben nor I were able to find it.

TargetJupiter
ConstellationVir
CategoryPlanets
Time6Mar05; 0010 EST
CommentsIn my binoculars we could see all four Galilean moons. Ganemede was way out to the left, Io was a little closer to the planet than half the Ganemede distance. Io was very close to the planet and tended to get lost in the flare but could be picked out if you looked closely. Calisto was all by itself on the leading side of Jupiter.

We had great views of Jupiter tonight in Peter's scope. The Northern and Southern Equitorial Belt were both very prominent. There were also to other belts closer to the poles which were not as pronounced. The southern one was easier to see than the northern. They were probably the South South or South South South Temperate Belt and North or North North Temperate Belt.


TargetCanis Minor (The Little Dog)
ConstellationUMi
CategoryConstellation
Time6Mar05; 0120 EST
CommentsI was able to see all the stars of the Little Dipper for the first time tonight.
StarMagnitudeMeaning
Polarisα UMi2.04Pole Star
North Star
Lodestar
Star of the Sea
Stella Maris
Cynosure
Yildunδ UMi4.38Star
 ε UMi4.25 
 ζ UMi4.34 
Kochabβ UMi2.10meaning unknown
Pherkadγ UMi3.07two calves
 η UMi4.97 
I also saw Pherkad Minor at Mag 5.04.

TargetDraco (The Dragon)
ConstellationDra
CategoryConstellation
Time6Mar05; 0130 EST
CommentsWe traced all the stars of Draco just before the police chased us out of the park.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.