26 December 2004

26 December 2004

Scientists were going to be working through the Christmas holiday weekend to secure more observations of 2004 MN4 with the aim of pinning down its orbit better and classifying at as a Torino 0 object which they are sure will happen. They have nearly tripled the number of observations but the effect has been opposite of what was expected. The chance of impact has increased from 1:300 on Thursday to 1:45 today.

I found a web page today that indicated the likely crater from an impact would be about 58 km (about 36 miles). My own calculations, based on a formula I found on the web placed it at 59.6 meters, so it looks like I need to see where I need to multiply by 1000 due to a change in units.

The same web source also said the likely impact area would be the Atlantic Ocean. That would seem to be a good thing until you remember what the tsunami caused by the big Indonesian earthquake did yesterday. Another Web site put the impact between time zones +3 and +10 or eastern Europe through Asia.

The current statistics show its closest approach as being 1.4 times the distance to the moon so it is probably more likely to tag the moon than earth.

Who will get a massive funding boost from Congress to mitigate this one?

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.