21 December 2004

20 December 2004

Observing
Location
TotL
Observational
Period
2100-2400 EST
Atmospheric
Conditions
COLD! This has been our coldest night this year and I hope the coldest we do. I didn't do a whole lot of observing through anyone's optics and even less documentation. The temperature was down in the single digits all night, 6F when we quit. The wind was calm most of the time so wind chill wasn't much of a problem but I did clock a gust at to 11 MPH and there was one stronger. The sky was a little mirky and there were a few wisps of cloud that passed through.
Instruments Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
Fujinon 7x50 binoculars - Ben
TeleVue Ranger - Peter
Tacahashi 22x60 binoculars - Peter
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Ben Cacace
Peter Tagatac

TargetC/2004 Q2 (Machholz)
ConstellationEri
CategoryComet
Time20Dec04; 2119 EST
CommentsIt looked like a big fuzzy ball. Tonight it was located a little to the left of the 39 Eri double and just below a dim star that is not in Planetarium so is less than Mag 6.5.
Another Machholz story.

TargetMoon
ConstellationPsc
CategoryLunar
Time20Dec04; 2145 EST
CommentsWe compared the views of the moon in the three pairs of binoculars. It filled greater than half of the field in Peters 22x Tacahashis. By comparison, in Ben's 7x Fujinons it looked cute. In his field of view there was a brightt star to the lower left of the Moon, probably Mira, ο Cet, which I had to move my eye out to the right to see well in my binoculars. Out on the other side of the moon a few of the stars of And and the Great Square were visible naked-eye.

TargetMeteor
ConstellationCol ?
CategoryMeteors
Time20Dec04; ~2345 EST
CommentsLow over the trees in the SE. It moved quickly through a horizontal arc of 5-10 degrees in the neighborhood of Col. It appeared to me to have started out as white, assumed a red aspect in the middle of its track, and returned to white. Both Ben and Peter reported it as being yellow.

The closest radiant that might be active right now is in Com, the Coma Berinecids, active 12Dec-23Jan, peaked yesterday with a ZHR of 5. It is 113 degrees distant and at roughly the same altitude.]

TargetM41, NGC2287
ConstellationCMa
CategoryDeep Space Objects
Time20Dec04; ~2345
CommentsM41 is an open cluster in the heart of the Great Dog. Seen in Ben's binoculars it was a small cluster of faint stars in a milky background. In Peter's binoculars they probably occupied about 1/4 of the field of view.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.