01 November 2004

31 October 2004

A minute ago it was almost 0200. Now it is only 0100. This is all so confusing. I am just figuring out where the stars belong after an observing hiatus and now they will all be moved again. Why can't we leave time alone. If I turn my clock back to 0100 every time it reaches 0200 it will never get to be 0300.

Now I have to remember that our time difference from UTC is -5 again.

Observing
Location
Oval, Parkchester South condominium, The Bronx, NY
Atmospheric
Conditions
It was a beautiful afternoon today with temperatures topping out over 70F. It was windy though with 15 MPH winds gusting to 25. A few clouds occasionally drifted past but primarily I had a beautiful blue sky. Clouds are starting to build in now but NOAA says only scattered clouds through 0100 tonight.
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars with Baader solar filter film
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway

TargetSunspots
Time31Oct04; 1353 EST
CategorySolar
Comments
687 This sunspot must be really tiny. It is also greatly foreshortened since it is over by the leading limb. All I could make out was a whole in the granularity of the sun's surface - a whiter area - right on the limb where the spot probably is.
689 Just a hint of a tiny spot. It is definitely dark and not just a smudge.
690 This appears to be a vertically elongated string of spots with the largest one nearest the top of the string.
691 A large irregular blob and widely separated smaller spot. It is more like two individual spots now than the complex it was last week. It looks to me like it is dissipating.
693 Two spots with a smudge between them. There is a penumbra visible around the spots. It looks like a big spot on the right with an associated smudge trailing it outside the it's penumbra and within a clear area surrounding the spot and smudge, and a smaller similar complex on the left, with the two clear areas touching between the smudges. Later: now I am seeing a small central spot with a large penumbra around it between the two end spots. It now looks more like a complex of three spots. I don't remember seeing large spots below the equator. This one must be 10-15 earth diameters.
695 A small spot with an even smaller one to the upper left.

I didn't get my camera aligned right on the optical axis of the binocular lens so this image is a little dark around the edges of the Sun, but that is what is allowing the sunpots to be seen. In the images where I was properly aligned all I got was a featureless white disk. NASA's picture is better, but then mine didn't cost billions of dollars.

TargetSquirrels
Time31Oct04; 1500 EST
CategoryFauna
CommentsLots of squirrels around the bench I am sitting on but no oak trees for them to collect acorns from. The closest squirrel appears not to be collecting new nuts but digging up from the south side of his tree ones he has already collected and re-burying them on the north side of the tree. It looks like there is a common foraging area out in the middle of the trees where everyone gets along. But if someone gets too close to one of the trees they get chased back to their own tree. One victor even pillaged a vanquished squirrels newly buried seeds. Given the choice between Sycamore and Maple trees the squirrels prefer to nest in the Sycamores.

Observing
Location
TotL
Atmospheric
Conditions
We were tight on the edge of a weather system last night and fortunately we were on the clear air side of it. It was very mild although a little moist with the temperature never dropping below 55. Winds were mostly light (<6 MPH) with occasional gusts to 9 MPH. It was enough to set Peter's scope in motion while I was observing through it. The air was very clear and the sky dark until the moon got up above the trees.
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
Tacahaschi 102 mm refractor - Peter
Fujinon 7x50 binoculars - Ben
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Peter Tagatac
Ben Cacace

TargetThe Coathanger, Brocchi's Cluster, Collinder 399
Time31Oct04; 2150 EST
CategoryAsterism
CommentsAlthough it is called a cluster research indicates that only 6 of the bright stars have the same proper motion so it is more properly called an asterism. It is a little over a field of view diagonally down from the feathers of Sge
Starhop to The Coathanger asterism.
More information on Brocchi's Cluster.

Targetο Cyg, 30 Cyg and 31 Cyg
Time31Oct04; 2209 EST
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsA moderately wide double. 31 Cyg, the brighter star, is gold and has a dimmer star next to it. 30 Cyg is moderately far away and is blue-white. 32 Cyg, a good bit distant (probably half a field or more), is about the same brightness and color as 31 Cyg. It is not part of the double.

Target8 Lac
Time31Oct04; 2242 EST
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsA tight double at 22 arc seconds. We can split it in Ben's binoculars and it is easy in mine.

Target35 Psc
Time31Oct04; 2253 EST
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsThis was a challenge object for my binoculars to see how close a double we can split in them. It is a very close double at 11.5 arc seconds. I would not have picked it out as a double myself. I think it is a real push for my binoculars. I could only see it as a double by greatly defocusing it whereupon two fuzzy balls appeared where I had seen one specular object before.

TargetMoon
Time31Oct04; 2259 EST
CategoryMoon
CommentsThe mountains in Mare Imbrium just beneath Plato are very obvious in Peter's scope. I can't tell what they are in my binoculars, but they appear as bright white patches in the mare.

Targetυ Aur
Time31Oct04; 2320 EST
CategoryStars
CommentsWhile star hopping to try to find M37 and M37 I came across this very red star, a deep orange.

Targetθ Tua
Time31Oct04; 2231
CategoryDouble Star
CommentsThe double in the Hyades could be split naked-eye even with the moon nearby lessening the contrast with the background sky.

TargetM42, The Great Orion Nebula, and M43
Time31Oct04; 2339 EST
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsM42 is a faint smudge around the Trapezium. M43 merges into it around a dimmer central star. In Peter's scope at 90x they look like a big molar with the roots paralleling a line of three bright stars beneath the Trapezium. The obvious part of M42 looks like a right triangle with its hypotenuse against the Trapezium. The Trapezium really takes a bight out of the nebulosity.

Target41 Dra
Time1Nov04; 0003 EST
CategoryDouble Star
CommentsBen got this 18.8 arc second, Mag 6.7/7.0 double as a challenge star for his binoculars and was able to split it. It was easier for me to split it when I threw the stars out of focus. In my binoculars it is an easy split with lots of dark sky between the stars.

TargetSaturn
Time1Nov04; 0008 EST
CategoryPlanets
CommentsSaturn was just above the trees on a line with Castor and Pollux. It was about twice the distance from Pollux as Pollux is from Castor. It looks like a cigar. Titan is visible to the upper left. In Peter's scope the Cassini Division was visible in the rings.

TargetNGC2244 and the Rosette Nebula, NGC2237
Time1Nov04; 0022 EST
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsNGC2244 is a large open cluster in Mon. Looks like a big X composed of five bright star surrounded by many dimmer ones.

[The APOD image referenced below indicates that NGC2244 is embedded in the Rosette Nebula and illuminates it. I definitely saw NGC2244 but was looking for a smaller and more distant object for the nebula and completely missed any nebulosity that might have been surrounding NGC2244 attributing it to atmospheric lightening of the background.]
More information on NGC2244.
More information on the Rosette Nebula.

TargetNGC2301
Time1Nov04; 0038 EST
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsAn open cluster in Mon. Faint stars. I used it when trying to star hop to Dolidze 25, the biggest open cluster.

Targetξ Ori
Time1Nov04; 0108 EST
CategoryDouble Star
CommentsObserved in Peter's scope at 60x. It is a quadruple star in the elbow of Orion's upraised arm. The brightest star has a fairly close very faint companion which would be easily missed. The two other stars in the system are dim compared to the bright star, but not as dim as the dimmest star. They appear to be about equal in brightness and are easily split.

Last night shortly after midnight a cyclist grazed one of my tripod legs while I was not standing next to it and it was knocked over. One of the binocular eyepieces took most of the impact when it hit the ground and the plastic housing that holds it over the porro prism was broken completely off the top of the binoculars. The prism is intact although it appears to have been scratched where light exits it to go to the ocular. The focusing wheel is grabbing so something has probably happened to the gears also. It all looks repairable, but at what cost. I spoke to Canon a little while ago and they say I need to send them to a repair facility for an estimate, which I anticipated. The estimate will be completed within 48 hours of receipt and repairs should be completed within 10-14 days of approval of the estimate. So now I need to ship the binoculars off to NJ.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.