19 October 2004

17 October 2004

Observing
Location
Bras d'Or Lookoff, Trans Canada Highway, Highway 105, Cape Breton, NS, Canada
46.245558 N, 60.504775
Atmospheric
Conditions
I was driving back from Baddeck to Sydney along the Trans-Canada Highway, Highway 105, and noticed stars out my window so I determined to stop for some observing at the St Ann's Lookoff or the Bras d'Or Lookoff. While driving up Kelly's Mountain I ran into a few patches of for but stopped at St Ann's Lookoff anyway. The observing was variable as fog was forming as the air moved down that side of the mountain so when it got pretty thick I drove across the crest to Bras d'Or Lookoff where the fog wasn't much of a problem at all. There was some schmutz up to about 3 degrees above the NE - E horizon and no stars were visible below Sirius.
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway

TargetM45, The Pleiades, NGC1432
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsThe Pleiades are just under a degree across at their widest point and yet, in all that sky, they are always the first thing I am able to identify. It must be because the six easily visible stars are all 3-4 magnitude so are fairly bright and confined to a small space. There are lots more stars there in the binoculars.

TargetHyades, Melotte 25 and Collinder 50
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsIt took a little work but I finally located Aldeberan and the Hayades. I am not able to see θ Tau as a naked-eye double here.

[I had initially classified the Hyades as an asterism but Ben has corrected me, indicating that it is really an open cluster, so now I am lumping it with the other clusters and numbered objects under the heading Deep Space Objects. I suspected that, given how large it looks in the sky, it must be the biggest open cluster so performed a Google search to confirm this. But I found a link to the National Solar Observatory's page of Astronomical Records, which lists all kinds of biggest, smallest, most, fewest and similar statistics about our solar system. They say that the largest open cluster is Dolidze 25 at 18.1 parsecs. The Hyades is 80 ly in diameter (10 ly for the central core). That converts to 24.5 parsecs so it is obvious that my two data sources are defining the diameter of the cluster differently. If we consider only the central core of the Hyades then the number listed by the NSO is larger, but we don't know what it represents. The Hyades is the nearest open cluster to earth that looks like an open cluster (the Big Dipper is an open cluster but has the appearance of individual stars).]

More information on the Hyades

TargetKemble's Cascade
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryAsterisms
CommentsAlthough I was not able to find Algol and α Per or β and ε Cas, which are my guide stars for finding Kemble's Cascade, I was able to put my glasses right on it by figuring the rough spatial relationship with M45 and the Hayades. The 8th magnitude stars were all very solid but again I was not picking out the double. I don't know if it is because I was hand holding the binoculars so they were always in motion, or because the sky is so clear that doubles appear differently here. Does atmosphere have a direct or more of a logarithmic effect on star visibility? Will the brightness of stars of differing magnitudes appear constant in all atmospheres? Since the magnitude numbers are given as absolutes it would seem that they will always appear the same, but how do the eye and brain interpret them?

TargetM31, Andromeda Galaxy
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsI was looking up over Kelly's Mountain toward the west and I saw, naked-eye, a blurry patch of sky. When I put the glasses on it it looked like a big cotton ball, a little more diffuse at the edges. I realized that I must be seeing the Andromeda galaxy. It was just a little bit away from the edge of the Milky Way.

TargetMilky Way
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsThe milky way was visible but more visible up over Kelly's Mountain toward the NW. It wasn't as solid looking as it had been a week ago and disappeared somewhere past the Zenith. I find the Milky Way easier to see naked-eye than with the binoculars. From NYC we can see the sky get lighter gray in the area of the Milky Way, but here, through the binoculars, the star desnity is just much greater. With magnification in a clear sky the milky appearance seems to disappear so the effect is more striking naked-eye.

TargetSirius
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryStars
CommentsSirius was low enough on the horizon that it is all I could see of CMa. Below it there was too much cloud or haze.

TargetMeteor
Time17Oct04; ~0130 ADT
CategoryMeteor Shower
CommentsI saw a meteor streaking across the sky for maybe 15-20 degrees of arc. I didn't notice any particular color but its passage was brief and I was not looking directly at it. I suspect that it was an Epsilon-Geminid which peak on 18Oct with a ZHR of 2.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.