11 July 2004

9 July 2004

Observing LocationThe Great Lawn (North) There were several large groups of fairly noisy kids in the park tonight. It was the first time we have been there that I have been especially vigilant about people moving around and where they might be when I was no longer aware of them. But most of them were going out into The Great Lawn or back into the Pinetum, places where there aren't paths or lights. An under cover police car stopped by and told us to be careful because of the number of people in the park and the value of our equipment. We weren't bothered and only got to show anything to one passer by all night. I think there are more people to show the sky to down at TPO, especially now that they are doing Shakespeare in the Park and some of those people would be heading east past us when the show lets out. But there is more sky to be seen from TotL and the view of midtown is spectacular when there is nothing to be seen above it.
Atmospheric ConditionsIt had been pleasant but windy all day today. Now it is cooling off a little and there is a light breeze. The cumulus clouds I saw this afternoon in the Bronx have cleared out leaving altostratus and cirrus that appear quite dense on the horizon, less so overhead although still visible. By midnight everything below 45 degrees was gone.
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie TeleVue TV76 refractor- Ben Tacahashi 102 refractor - Peter
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway Ben Cacace Peter Tagatac Ken Brown Debbie & Sammy

TargetJupiter
Time9Jul04; 2101 EDT
CategoryPlanets
CommentsAlways the first object to visible these days, Jupiter appeared about 10 minutes ago just as a passer by stopped to talk to me. It is just getting dark enough now to see one of the moons to the east and there has been a field star high and on the right - too dim to be listed in my planetarium program.

Targetε Lyrae, The Double-Double
Time9Jul04; 2112 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsThis double star near Vega in Lyra looked like I was seeing four stars. The lower primary was the brightest and gold to orange in color. Its secondary appeared small and above it to the left. The secondary was above and separated about a quarter to half degree. It was dimmer and green to blue. I got the feeling I was seeing its secondary above and slightly to the right and turquoise to blue. The seeing has gone downhill a bit while I have been observing.
[Binocular Astronomy says you can split Epsilon 1 and Epsilon 2 naked-eye if you have acute vision and can resolve there secondaries in a telescope at 100x so my impression that there were four stars there was probably due mostly to the knowledge that there really are four there. The Dawes Limit of an optical instrument limits how close two objects can be and still be perceived as separate objects. The limit for my binoculars is 2.32 arc-seconds. Skyhound says Espilon 1 Lyrae as a double separated by 2.36 arc-seconds so might be split with my binoculars, and Epsilon 2 Lyrae is a slightly dimmer and slightly closer double at 2.3 arc seconds which is just beyond my binoculars' Dawes limit under ideal conditions.]

Targetμ 1 Scorpii
Time9Jul04; 2129 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsAppeared right in the tree line. They appeared horizontal and about 15" apart I think. They are fairly equal in brightness with the right one only slightly brighter.
[Binocula Astronomymy says they are 346" apart so I still have a way to go estimating angular distances in my binoculars. The binoculars have a field of view of 4.5 degrees which is equal to 270' or 16,200".]

TargetLesath, υ Scorpii and Shaula, λ Scopii
Time9Jul04; 2208 EDT
CategoryStars
CommentsThese stars looked like a very wide double but they are actually the stars of the scorpion's stinger. They are minutes if not degrees apart.
[The Melbourne Planetarium has a nice (although upside down for the northern hemisphere) binocular star hopping guide to Scorpius.]

TargetInternational Space Station
Time9Jul04; 2208 EDT
CategorySatellites
CommentsVery large and bright. Heavens Above had it at magnitude 1 which is probably about right. Passed through one of the guide star of the big dipper, Dubhe (Alpha UMa). It was moving very fast when we saw it in Ursa Major but by the time it got into Cassiopeia it appeared to have slowed down, an illusion caused by the fact that it was then moving away from us but while in UMa it had been moving more at right angles to our line of sight. It got dim but was still visible naked-eye until just before it reached the tree line in the NE.

TargetIridium 60
Time9Jul04; 2320 EDT
CategorySatellites
CommentsThis flare was to have lit up during the ISS pass and brighten to magnitude -1.4 then fade before the end of the ISS pass but it did not even appear to be magnitude 1 at its brightest, and it had already faded before the ISS was sighted.

TargetIzar, δ Bootis
Time9Jul04, 2333 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsGolden close double. Primary is much brighter than the secondary. Used it to star hop to Mu Bootis. Observed it in both my binoculars and Ben's telescope.

TargetAlkalurops, μ Bootis
Time9Jul04; 2345 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsI hopped here from Izar. A wide double with an obvious magnitude difference. The primary looks white and the secondary ruddy orange. In Ben's scope at 96x we were able to split the secondary

TargetC/2003 K4 (LINEAR)
Time9Jul04; 2350 EDT
CategoryComets
CommentsI hopped to the area where K4 was supposed to be from Mu Bootis. We definitely identified Nu 1 and Nu 2 Bootis, a widely spaced pair of equal magnitude stars (a double?), in the upper left corner of the field, Yale 5726 in the lower left, Yale 5677 in the lower right corner, and something right in the center of the field where K4 should have been. But that last object looked too star-like for a comet. Relative to the other stars it was about the right magnitude though. Unfortunately this field of view is right around the cutoff limit of Planetarium so any other stars were not displayed.
[The sky photos at the NASA SkyView Web site don't show anything of the appropriate brightness in that area. We may have seen the comet but it didn't look fuzzy enough.]
[Cossen in Binocular AStronomy, in his chapter on observing galaxies, says "... 7x neither darkens the sky background not magnifies a galaxy image as much as 10x, consequently many galaxies that distinctly appear as disks or patches in 10x50s will be merely stellar in 7x50s..."]
I think we probably did see the comet.

TargetAlberio
Time10Jul04; 0008 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsThe head of the Swan, Cygnus, and its beta star. Viewed in Peters scope at 22x. To me the primary looked yellow and the secondary white, but the secondary appeared blue to Peter and Ben.

TargetM 39, NGC7092
Time10Jul04 0038 EDT
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsAn open cluster between Cygnus and Lacerta. It is an equilateral triangle about 1 degree on a side. 3 evenly spaced stars on one side; 3 irregularly spaced stars on another side; last side only has the 2 corner stars.
Follow the body of the swan back about 8 degrees past Deneb then drop down about 4 degrees.

TargetM 27, Dumbbell Nebula
Time10Jul04; 0055 EDT
CategoryDeep Space Objects
CommentsObserved in Peters scope. It is a large object. I couldn't see it normally but it was obviovs with Ben's nebula filter held between the eyepiece and my eye.

Target31 ψ 1 Draconis
Time10Jul04; 0111 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsA double star coming out of the U-turn in the dragon's body behind the head. The smaller star looks blue, the larger one cream colored. In my binoculars it is a tight double lacking color but easy to split.

TargetShooting Star
Time10July04; 0127 EDT
CategoryMeteors
CommentsStreaking across the sky from Cygnus to Camelopardalis with a very long yellow to green tail.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.