23 July 2004

21 July 2004

Observing
Location
The Great Lawn
I started out at Belvedere Castle before sunset to look for Jupiter and birds; then moved to the King Jagaello statue and hung out for a while with a couple people from the Irish Arts Center who were playing fiddle and pennywhistle; and finally moved to TotL to end the night
Atmospheric
Conditions
It was bad. The air was hot and humid. There was a thunderhead moving in from NJ as I was heading up to the park and I figured I would be getting wet but it was moving toward Brooklyn and I lucked out. The clouds were really bad all the way around the horizon. I had wanted to try for C/2001 Q4 NEAT but the sky was barely dark enough to make out both of the guide stars of the Big Dipper most of the time.
InstrumentsCanon 15x50 Image Stabilized binoculars - Charlie
TeveVue TV76 - Ben
16x70 binoculars - Tom
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Ben Cacace
Tom Clabough

TargetMoon
Time21Jul04; 2007 EDT
CategoryMoon
CommentsI saw the crescent of the 4 day 14 hour moon during early twilight. It was seen through a haze and looked a little blue. There was nice definition near the terminator in the south. Mare Crisium was plainly evident. As the night wore on and the moon dropped a little in elevation it turned very orange and the definition decreased.

TargetJupiter
Time21Jul04; 2026 EDT
CategoryPlanets
CommentsI started looking for Jupiter once I saw the moon but wasn't able to located it until the sky got a little darker. When I did find it it was not a blown out point source the way it normally appears but rather appeared very round and flat - almost as though a hole had been punched in a sheet of light gray paper and I was seeing a sheet of white paper through the hole. I was hand holding the binoculars and using the image stabilization but was not able to detect any moons.

TargetC2001 Q4 NEAT
Time21Jul04; 2130 EDT
CategoryI looked for the comet several times but there was just too much cloud up there to pick it out. It is supposed to be directly between the pointer stars of the Big Dipper and nearly opposite 42 UMa. I would have needed more contrast than my binoculars provide to have any chance of finding it in that sky. I was having trouble picking out α UMa naked-eye.
Comments

Targetδ Lyrae
Time21Jul04; 2143 EDT
CategoryDouble Stars
CommentsVega was visible so I figured I would give the Ring Nebula a try. I didn't really expect to find it hand held under those seeing conditions. The δ Lyrae double was easy and I didn't spend a lot of time on them, using them just to fix my position. Looking diagonally across the parallelogram of Lyra from them I found a pair of stars which I think were ν 1 and ν 2 Lyrae. The upper one was a pale blue and the lower gold. I didn't see anything bright enough to have been β Lyrae though.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.