13 June 2004

30 May 2004

Observing
Location
The Great Lawn, Central Park, New York, NY
We have been using the north end of The Great Lawn recently in lieu of Turtle Pond because it has been affording better views of Comet NEAT. I don't think there are as many people there as we get at Turtle Pond. The view of Midtown is great.
Atmospheric
Conditions
Observing
Instruments
Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized Binoculars - Charlie
TeleVue TV76 - Ben
102mm refractor-Peter
18x70 binoculars - Tom
Observing
Party
Charlie Ridgway
Ben Cacace
Peter Tagatac
Tom Clabough

TargetJupiter
Time30May04; 22:30 EDT
CategoryPlanets
CommentsJ-Moons! was not agreeing with my observations tonight or with Planetarium or Jup. Later in the evening I couldn't get Jupiter to properly focus. It looked like an upside down mushroom no matter what I did.

TargetMoon
Time04-5-30; 23:00 EDT
CategoryPlanets
Comments Clavius (beneath Tycho) - I had trouble identifying it in Ben's scope until I had seen it in Peter's. I couldn't find it at all in my binoculars. There is an arc of craters horizontally across the central portion of the floor. They increase in size left to right (reversed image). There is also a string of smaller craters along the crater's southern rim. Aristarchus was easy to find in the binoculars being bright white just inside of the terminator. In the scopes it could be seen as a crater. Next to it in the limb side is Herodotus. It is lightly smaller than Aristarchus and darker. Arching out of the top of Herodotus is the sinuous Rille Vallis Schoteri which looked like the crater's rim rather than a valley. Above Herodotus is a horizontal ridge that appears quite large. Beneath and toward the midline as Mons Herodatus and near the terminator what appear to be a group of domes. Craters Billy and Hansteen are north of Mare Humorum and closer to the limb. Billy is the lower of the two and appears featureless. Hansteen is closer to the limb and appeared as though there might be a concentric crater inside of it.

TargetM 39, NGC7092
Time30May04; 23:10 EDT
Category
CommentsI was pointing up at Cygnus and saw bunches of stars in the binoculars. I thought it might be an open cluster and wanted to check with Ben but he was Busy. Peter announced he was on M39 so I looked and it looked similar in density to what I was seeing. Peter couldn't see through the binoculars with my interocular setting so I adjusted them. When he looked there was nothing there at all. I apparently had moved the binoculars when adjusting them and the clouds rolled in preventing me from reacquiring it. I suspect that I had stumbled onto M39 but I can't be sure.

Disclaimer
This is my personal record of my astronomical observations. It was written for my personal reference. The only reason it is in a blog is that a blog is a very convenient way to get the records formatted more or less uniformly and they will, hopefully, have greater longevity at Google where the servers are backed up than on my hard drive which never gets backed up. I occasionally include copyrighted material in my posts. I do this to make it convenient for me to access things I think I might want to refer to again. I think of this like making a photocopy of something I read that I put in a file where I can find it when I want it. As I understand copyright law, as explained in the DVD series Copyright Compliance by Chip Taylor Communications, this use is allowed under the Fair Use doctrine since I am not making any money on this blog, I don’t publicize the blog, and only occasionally post small excerpts of copyrighted works.


Disclosure
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.

The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.

The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.

This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.